H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Caroline Wozniacki H2H: 0-2
Caroline Wozniacki holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2019 Charleston third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2019* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-2 6-2 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2019* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-3 6-2 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |