H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Chanelle Scheepers H2H: 0-1

Chanelle Scheepers holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanelle Scheepers leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanelle Scheepers won the 2014 Bastad round of 16 3-6 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Chanelle Scheepers
RSA Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanelle Scheepers #91 3-6 6-4 7-5 Laura Siegemund #201 Match data Jul 18, 2014* R16 Bastad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Chanelle Scheepers #429 #37 1,505 1,724 87 108 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Chanelle Scheepers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #299 1,503 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% #187 1,485 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2009 4–8 33.3% #127 1,484 0 0
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2010 7–9 43.8% #103 1,523 0 0
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2011 20–19 51.3% #38 1,657 0 1
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2012 24–26 48.0% #60 1,678 0 1
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2013 15–21 41.7% #80 1,571 0 1
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 2014 15–17 46.9% #77 1,619 0 1
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 2015 1–5 16.7% #424 1,569 0 1
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Chanelle Scheepers
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 16 11 27 59.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 5 13 18 27.8% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — — — — — 49 66 115 42.6% 34 33 67 50.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 176/193 of Chanelle Scheepers's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Chanelle Scheepers
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 1.0 2.5 61.9% 56.5% 23.0% 58.3% 18.2% 44.2% 34.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 12/12 1.3 3.5 65.7% 55.7% 41.8% 51.0% 48.2% 50.9% 38.0%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% 2010 13/16 0.4 5.2 65.2% 58.3% 43.7% 55.9% 45.4% 52.9% 44.2%
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% 2011 36/39 1.0 4.5 64.1% 59.3% 42.3% 50.1% 45.2% 53.1% 45.2%
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2012 48/50 0.6 5.3 61.5% 58.4% 43.7% 46.8% 50.2% 52.6% 46.1%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% 2013 30/36 0.9 4.9 60.7% 57.6% 43.3% 51.2% 43.5% 51.8% 45.5%
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% 2014 29/32 0.7 5.1 65.3% 56.8% 42.1% 48.3% 46.3% 51.4% 46.6%
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% 2015 6/6 0.3 6.3 66.0% 57.3% 46.6% 57.3% 39.4% 53.3% 41.4%
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 176/195 0.8 4.9 63.2% 57.9% 42.8% 49.9% 46.1% 52.2% 44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Chanelle Scheepers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1504 97.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.16
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1485 92.0 +0.92 -0.21 0.610 39.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — 0–1 — +0.01
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1485 101.3 -2.96 -2.55 0.773 44.9% +7 — — 36.7% -1.33 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 101.1 +0.02
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2010 1523 115.7 -1.51 +0.20 0.939 48.8% -20 +53 — 43.2% -0.27 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 100.4 +1.11
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2011 1657 122.4 -2.12 +1.22 0.962 49.0% +14 -94 — 47.9% -0.13 11–5 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 108.7 +1.86
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2012 1678 136.9 -2.13 +2.84 0.974 49.4% +14 -66 -142 48.7% -0.06 6–11 (35%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 -0.91
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2013 1572 114.1 -3.06 +0.92 0.945 48.7% -12 +86 — 41.5% -0.54 6–4 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.8 +0.76
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 2014 1620 124.9 -2.98 +1.97 0.959 49.1% -94 +102 — 46.1% -0.13 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 101.7 -0.75
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 2015 1569 103.8 -0.95 -0.07 0.887 47.5% -79 +117 — 31.3% -1.56 1–3 (25%) — — -0.20
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1725 125.1 -2.36 +1.34 0.940 48.6% -7 +36 -142 44.5% -0.37 37–33 (53%) 18–23 (44%) 100.4 +1.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.