H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Christina Mchale H2H: 1-0

Laura Siegemund holds a 1–0 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2021 Miami Open first round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Christina Mchale
United States Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #59 6-3 7-5 Christina Mchale #90 Match data Mar 25, 2021* R128 Miami Open WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Christina Mchale #319 #24 1,935 1,803 167 210 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Christina Mchale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #231 1,499 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2010 8–9 47.1% #109 1,557 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2011 19–17 52.8% #43 1,718 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2012 21–21 50.0% #33 1,668 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2013 13–18 41.9% #66 1,633 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2014 20–21 48.8% #52 1,647 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2015 18–21 46.2% #63 1,623 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2016 25–22 53.2% #45 1,688 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2017 19–27 41.3% #64 1,682 0 1
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2018 8–17 32.0% #151 1,565 0 1
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2019 7–10 41.2% #88 1,651 0 1
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2020 6–8 42.9% #81 1,675 0 1
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2021 2–16 11.1% #159 1,526 0 1
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 2022 0–1 0.0% #319 1,453 0 1
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Christina Mchale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 7 13 46.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 13 11 24 54.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 9 10 19 47.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 16 18 34 47.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2018 5 11 16 31.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 1 7 8 12.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — — — — — 115 129 244 47.1% 34 51 85 40.0% 16 28 44 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 352/378 of Christina Mchale's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Christina Mchale
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 3.0 2.3 59.2% 59.9% 39.0% 56.3% 41.3% 51.5% 45.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 16/17 2.8 1.8 61.7% 62.7% 41.5% 46.7% 42.5% 54.2% 41.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 35/36 2.8 3.0 60.8% 63.8% 46.4% 52.4% 41.9% 57.0% 43.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 40/42 2.7 2.3 64.6% 62.9% 45.5% 51.7% 44.6% 56.6% 41.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 26/31 2.2 3.4 62.0% 62.5% 45.8% 51.8% 46.8% 56.4% 42.1%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2014 40/41 2.5 4.3 59.8% 64.5% 43.8% 53.1% 46.4% 56.1% 43.8%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 30/39 2.3 3.0 62.9% 62.3% 47.3% 54.8% 44.4% 56.7% 37.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 44/48 2.9 3.8 59.8% 63.9% 43.4% 51.5% 50.6% 55.7% 45.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 43/46 2.7 4.3 60.5% 63.0% 43.1% 58.3% 52.1% 55.0% 44.6%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% 2018 25/25 1.5 4.9 60.6% 60.7% 38.8% 54.7% 50.5% 52.3% 42.1%
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% 2019 17/17 1.4 3.5 63.6% 58.8% 41.6% 49.6% 48.0% 52.4% 46.3%
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2020 14/14 1.4 3.4 64.7% 59.9% 44.8% 46.3% 46.8% 54.5% 41.6%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% 2021 18/18 1.6 3.4 63.9% 55.6% 39.5% 47.4% 47.3% 49.7% 41.6%
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 45.2% 35.7% 50.0% 16.7% 42.2% 34.7%
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 352/378 2.4 3.5 61.7% 62.3% 43.8% 52.5% 46.9% 55.1% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Christina Mchale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1499 112.0 -1.43 -0.60 0.927 48.4% +20 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 — — +0.21
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1558 114.8 -0.88 -1.14 0.895 47.6% +8 -2 — 38.2% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +1.19
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1718 138.4 +1.67 -0.12 0.999 49.9% -36 -92 -111 49.4% -0.19 6–5 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 -0.79
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1669 131.2 +1.31 -0.92 0.962 49.2% +12 -8 -43 50.5% -0.06 10–9 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 98.5 +0.10
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1633 129.7 +0.29 -1.34 0.964 49.2% +46 -17 -42 45.9% -0.43 4–8 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 97.6 +0.57
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2014 1648 128.3 +0.05 +0.06 0.998 49.9% +21 -20 -61 46.9% -0.16 9–9 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.2 -0.76
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1624 117.2 -1.05 -2.81 0.869 47.3% -8 -19 +3 48.2% -0.42 5–8 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1689 132.8 -0.26 +1.86 1.022 50.6% -20 -71 +21 50.9% +0.02 13–9 (59%) 8–5 (62%) 105.3 -0.48
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1682 134.3 -0.73 +0.47 0.992 50.0% +22 -90 -13 45.4% -0.08 7–11 (39%) 2–12 (14%) 87.9 -0.74
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2018 1565 113.9 -3.09 -1.16 0.882 47.4% +18 -24 — 33.9% -0.96 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 94.3 -0.53
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2019 1652 124.8 -2.57 +1.92 0.974 49.2% +43 — — 39.0% -0.42 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.25
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2020 1675 129.3 -0.85 -0.02 0.915 48.3% +51 -150 — 45.5% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.88
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2021 1526 113.1 -3.71 -1.23 0.828 45.8% +71 -40 -50 25.6% -1.56 0–7 (0%) 5–2 (71%) 95.3 -0.33
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 2022 1453 96.2 +3.05 -2.38 0.600 38.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.08
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 2025 1428 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1804 132.0 -0.48 -0.28 0.953 49.0% +13 -42 -28 45.1% -0.35 67–80 (46%) 40–48 (45%) 94.6 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.