H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 1-3

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 3–1 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 3–0 on clay, while Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2020 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-4.

GER Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 2023 Indian Wells WTA 1000 Q1 Q Hard Laura Siegemund #124 7-6(3) 6-3 Coco Vandeweghe #125 Match data
Jan 22, 2020* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Laura Siegemund #72 6-1 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #226 Match data
May 29, 2018* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Coco Vandeweghe #15 6-4 6-4 Laura Siegemund #358 Match data
Apr 27, 2018* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Coco Vandeweghe #16 6-4 4-6 6-3 Laura Siegemund #100 Match data
May 9, 2017* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Coco Vandeweghe #20 6-2 4-6 6-3 Laura Siegemund #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Laura Siegemund #87 #27 1,630 1,828 143 152 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2
28 2016 27–17 61.4% #31 1,735 0 1 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2017 14–12 53.8% #69 1,792 0 2 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,691 0 2 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,666 0 2 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2
32 2020 11–9 55.0% #51 1,762 0 2
33 2021 8–13 38.1% #125 1,727 0 2
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,652 0 2
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,784 0 2
36 2024 17–16 51.5% #80 1,738 0 2
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #87 1,748 0 2