H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 0-2
Dominika Cibulkova holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2017 Sydney third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2017* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-2 6-0 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2016* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Dominika Cibulkova | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |