H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Julia Goerges H2H: 2-0

Laura Siegemund holds a 2–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2020 Roland Garros second round 1-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #66 1-6 6-1 6-3 Julia Goerges #41 Match data Sep 30, 2020* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Laura Siegemund #40 4-6 6-3 4-0 (ret.) Julia Goerges #73 Match data Jul 23, 2016* SF Bastad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Julia Goerges
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Julia Goerges
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — — — — — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 524/562 of Julia Goerges's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Julia Goerges
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7%
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6%
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5%
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8%
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5%
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Julia Goerges
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.66
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 -0.08
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 104.4 -1.65
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) 98.6 -1.13
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) 100.1 -0.26
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 89.5 +1.42
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 89.3 -1.01
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.9 -0.01
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.7 -0.80
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2017 1893 143.8 +5.08 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.01
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 107.5 -0.46
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 95.7 +0.72
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.07
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1945 141.6 +3.70 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.