H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Julia Goerges H2H: 2-0
Laura Siegemund holds a 2–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2020 Roland Garros second round 1-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2016* | Bastad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 4-6 6-3 4-0 (ret.) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laura Siegemund | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |