H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Karolina Pliskova H2H: 1-2
Karolina Pliskova holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Karolina Pliskova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Pliskova won the 2026 Rome third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 34
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2026 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Karolina Pliskova | 6-1 6-4 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Karolina Pliskova | 6-3 6-3 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2017* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 | Karolina Pliskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Karolina Pliskova | #64 | #1 | 6,940 | 2,041 | 421 | 241 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Karolina Pliskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #736 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #465 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #118 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #71 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #4 | 1,930 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,916 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #2 | 1,975 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #6 | 1,914 | 0 | 16 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #4 | 1,972 | 0 | 16 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,834 | 0 | 16 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #38 | 1,759 | 0 | 16 |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #41 | 1,777 | 0 | 17 |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #64 | 1,879 | 0 | 17 |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |