H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Karolina Pliskova H2H: 1-2

Karolina Pliskova holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Karolina Pliskova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Pliskova won the 2026 Italian Open third round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Karolina Pliskova
Czech Republic Age 34 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karolina Pliskova #130 6-1 6-4 Laura Siegemund #46 Match data May 10, 2026 R32 Italian Open WTA 1000 Clay
Karolina Pliskova #2 6-3 6-3 Laura Siegemund #72 Match data Jan 23, 2020* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Laura Siegemund #49 7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 Karolina Pliskova #3 Match data Apr 29, 2017* QF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Karolina Pliskova #57 #1 6,940 2,045 430 248 63.4% 0 2 0 9 6 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Karolina Pliskova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #736 1,491 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2008 2–1 66.7% #465 1,530 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #221 1,521 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #212 1,504 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,467 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2012 1–6 14.3% #118 1,444 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2013 11–15 42.3% #71 1,514 0 1
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2014 44–24 64.7% #23 1,800 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 2015 50–25 66.7% #11 1,814 0 4
24 — — — — — — — 2016 41–21 66.1% #6 1,895 0 6
25 — — — — — — — 2017 52–18 74.3% #4 1,928 0 9
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2018 48–22 68.6% #8 1,921 0 11
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2019 51–16 76.1% #2 1,979 0 15
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2020 14–8 63.6% #6 1,916 0 16
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2021 37–19 66.1% #4 1,969 0 16
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 2022 21–19 52.5% #31 1,835 0 16
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 2023 17–20 45.9% #38 1,763 0 16
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 2024 20–17 54.1% #41 1,777 0 17
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 2026 21–11 65.6% #57 1,855 0 17
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Karolina Pliskova
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 8 8 16 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 36 18 54 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 37 19 56 66.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 25 13 38 65.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 37 12 49 75.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 6 1 7 85.7%
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 32 16 48 66.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 34 11 45 75.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 2 11 81.8%
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 2022 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2023 14 14 28 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2024 15 11 26 57.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2026 6 5 11 54.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — 289 160 449 64.4% 83 56 139 59.7% 58 32 90 64.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 614/678 of Karolina Pliskova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Karolina Pliskova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 5.0 2.0 39.7% 55.2% 50.0% 40.0% 83.3% 52.1% 45.7%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 1.5 4.0 54.7% 62.1% 35.7% 28.3% 62.5% 50.0% 32.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 2.0 3.0 63.1% 65.9% 37.5% 57.1% 25.0% 55.4% 31.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 4.7 2.7 60.4% 63.4% 33.2% 48.5% 33.3% 51.4% 33.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 7/7 6.1 2.9 63.3% 66.4% 40.1% 54.0% 42.5% 56.9% 32.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 23/26 6.7 3.0 58.1% 72.6% 43.5% 56.8% 43.9% 60.7% 38.6%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2014 66/68 6.5 2.9 58.8% 71.6% 47.2% 53.4% 43.5% 61.4% 42.8%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 58/75 6.9 3.3 61.3% 72.1% 49.2% 58.3% 52.8% 63.4% 40.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 52/62 8.8 2.7 58.4% 75.5% 46.8% 58.8% 45.4% 63.3% 43.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 60/70 6.6 2.9 58.6% 74.5% 48.5% 59.7% 46.2% 63.9% 44.3%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% 2018 63/70 5.8 3.6 63.6% 69.7% 47.0% 58.1% 46.6% 61.2% 43.4%
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% 2019 63/67 7.6 3.1 65.9% 74.0% 46.0% 57.9% 48.3% 64.3% 45.1%
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2020 22/22 5.6 4.0 61.4% 70.4% 46.7% 58.2% 46.1% 61.2% 43.7%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% 2021 50/56 7.3 5.7 62.3% 70.4% 43.6% 61.3% 46.0% 60.1% 41.8%
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% 2022 40/40 6.7 5.9 64.1% 67.5% 41.7% 57.9% 48.6% 58.5% 41.2%
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% 2023 36/37 6.4 4.5 65.1% 69.3% 38.7% 53.3% 49.4% 58.7% 42.2%
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% 2024 35/37 7.1 6.9 64.5% 68.0% 42.9% 61.2% 50.7% 59.0% 41.3%
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% 2026 32/33 3.6 5.6 65.3% 66.9% 42.3% 54.1% 52.7% 58.4% 40.8%
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 614/679 6.7 3.9 62.0% 71.2% 45.3% 57.5% 47.5% 61.3% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Karolina Pliskova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1491 98.9 -2.80 -7.65 0.953 48.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1531 101.3 -0.28 -0.31 0.643 42.7% — +24 — 57.1% -0.71 1–0 — — -0.42
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1522 99.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.16
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1504 97.5 -1.06 +0.20 0.710 44.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1468 97.1 +1.66 -2.13 0.683 42.9% — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — +0.18
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1445 104.0 +1.53 -4.70 0.756 45.0% +44 — — 14.3% -2.14 — — — -0.46
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1515 116.1 +2.68 -3.87 0.984 49.7% +34 -71 +36 45.0% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 -0.31
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2014 1801 141.2 +4.39 -0.61 1.109 51.9% 0 -220 -224 60.9% +0.70 15–10 (60%) 10–7 (59%) 106.9 +0.20
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1815 145.3 +4.92 -0.94 1.100 51.8% +19 -177 -128 60.8% +0.67 19–7 (73%) 13–11 (54%) 108.0 +2.74
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1896 151.5 +6.52 +1.70 1.194 53.3% +6 -233 -105 61.9% +0.99 11–6 (65%) 9–14 (39%) 101.0 -0.57
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1929 157.4 +7.32 +1.47 1.225 53.9% +22 -159 -42 68.6% +1.31 12–7 (63%) 8–11 (42%) 99.8 +1.32
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2018 1921 156.9 +4.54 +1.21 1.118 52.1% +3 +8 -35 62.5% +0.75 16–6 (73%) 12–8 (60%) 105.8 -0.73
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2019 1980 157.5 +7.44 +2.67 1.263 54.4% +1 -8 -3 68.7% +1.37 19–12 (61%) 8–8 (50%) 98.3 +1.00
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2020 1917 146.8 +3.25 +0.83 1.125 52.4% -13 +73 — 58.8% +0.96 5–2 (71%) 2–7 (22%) 97.0 -0.18
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2021 1970 149.6 +3.90 +0.30 1.047 51.1% -17 +46 +115 59.8% +0.56 13–4 (76%) 8–6 (57%) 104.7 +1.20
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 2022 1836 136.2 +1.10 -0.03 0.992 50.1% +34 +46 +173 48.5% +0.10 12–5 (71%) 6–9 (40%) 97.8 +1.04
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 2023 1763 149.7 +2.46 +0.60 1.021 50.2% +68 +75 +144 48.1% +0.15 4–7 (36%) 1–8 (11%) 87.6 +0.27
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 2024 1778 141.4 +1.97 -0.71 1.007 50.4% +61 -2 +155 56.2% +0.14 9–10 (47%) 9–5 (64%) 100.9 -0.55
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 2025 1728 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 2026 1856 135.9 +1.06 -1.25 0.979 49.3% -58 +30 +102 58.9% -0.01 8–3 (73%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 +0.36
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 2045 152.8 +4.37 +0.29 1.095 51.7% +14 -53 +11 59.3% +0.63 147–86 (63%) 96–100 (49%) 101.2 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.