H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Kristina Mladenovic H2H: 3-0
Laura Siegemund holds a 3–0 lead over Kristina Mladenovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2020 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 7-5 6-3 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| May 4, 2019 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Kristina Mladenovic | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2017* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Laura Siegemund | 6-1 2-6 7-6(5) | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2016* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 1-6 7-5 6-1 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Kristina Mladenovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |