H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Petra Martic H2H: 1-2

Petra Martic holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Petra Martic leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2023 Madrid Open second round 7-6(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Petra Martic
Croatia Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Martic #33 7-6(6) 6-3 Laura Siegemund #128 Match data Apr 28, 2023* R64 Madrid Open WTA 1000 Clay
Laura Siegemund #66 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0 Petra Martic #17 Match data Oct 3, 2020* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Petra Martic #60 7-5 4-6 6-4 Laura Siegemund #264 Match data Jul 21, 2018* QF Bucharest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,938 212 215 49.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Petra Martic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,505 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,516 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,621 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,691 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,607 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,613 0 0
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,798 0 0
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,901 0 1
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,804 0 1
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,656 0 1
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,796 0 2
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,806 0 2
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 2024 9–19 32.1% #122 1,635 0 2
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,606 0 2
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Petra Martic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 11 9 20 55.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 18 10 28 64.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 14 12 26 53.8% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2022 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — — — — — 109 129 238 45.8% 77 63 140 55.0% 24 21 45 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 406/427 of Petra Martic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Petra Martic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 4.0 3.0 51.0% 75.5% 55.3% 50.0% 33.3% 65.6% 38.4%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 3.0 5.5 66.8% 69.2% 33.8% 56.3% 66.7% 57.6% 48.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 12/13 2.0 3.0 60.5% 63.9% 45.2% 60.5% 50.2% 57.0% 40.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 18/19 2.4 4.3 62.9% 60.8% 45.8% 55.5% 38.6% 55.0% 37.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 27/30 3.8 5.3 56.2% 64.5% 47.1% 50.8% 38.7% 56.7% 41.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 35/36 4.6 4.3 57.8% 65.0% 45.4% 53.3% 48.4% 56.5% 40.2%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2013 16/19 4.2 5.4 60.1% 62.7% 45.0% 52.2% 33.9% 55.5% 40.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 7/9 3.7 4.0 53.2% 61.9% 39.2% 50.3% 47.2% 51.5% 35.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 6/8 4.2 5.3 56.0% 64.0% 40.8% 47.3% 50.6% 54.3% 30.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 6/6 4.0 4.7 66.0% 62.8% 47.5% 57.2% 40.4% 57.6% 39.3%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% 2017 10/10 3.4 2.7 68.9% 66.1% 50.3% 55.1% 51.5% 61.0% 45.4%
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% 2018 43/43 3.2 2.2 62.8% 66.7% 48.8% 56.4% 43.9% 60.2% 42.8%
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2019 52/53 2.6 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 49.8% 59.9% 49.1% 60.7% 44.2%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% 2020 25/25 3.2 2.6 61.7% 65.2% 50.7% 64.0% 39.1% 59.6% 41.7%
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% 2021 36/36 3.8 2.8 58.8% 66.3% 46.7% 51.1% 43.6% 58.1% 39.1%
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% 2022 42/42 4.5 3.3 60.1% 67.7% 49.2% 48.0% 43.3% 60.1% 40.9%
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% 2023 38/39 4.8 3.4 57.1% 68.6% 47.9% 56.2% 40.1% 60.0% 39.8%
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% 2024 27/28 4.4 3.5 58.8% 67.3% 42.8% 47.6% 49.7% 57.1% 37.9%
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% 2025 3/7 1.7 3.7 62.1% 57.5% 38.4% 45.6% 35.6% 50.5% 41.2%
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 406/427 3.7 3.4 60.3% 65.9% 47.2% 54.3% 44.1% 58.4% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Petra Martic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1480 97.4 -1.36 -1.85 1.117 51.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1506 104.8 -0.42 +0.18 1.145 53.2% +19 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — +0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1539 112.1 +0.24 -2.39 0.933 48.5% +1 +22 — 50.0% -0.21 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.36
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1517 116.5 -0.78 -3.50 0.832 46.5% +35 -37 — 31.8% -1.23 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.7 -0.85
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1622 125.1 +0.45 -1.86 0.961 48.9% +17 -104 — 51.4% +0.07 10–4 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 111.1 +0.97
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1692 131.0 +0.67 -2.20 0.926 48.6% -8 -98 — 48.8% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 104.8 -1.21
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2013 1607 115.3 -1.25 -2.67 0.900 48.0% -10 -6 +18 41.9% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 -0.05
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1516 93.7 -1.25 -4.62 0.729 43.8% +28 — — 17.6% -2.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.24
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1435 105.3 -1.11 -3.28 0.673 43.0% +70 +50 — 0.0% -3.06 — — — -0.11
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1525 114.6 -0.08 -2.76 0.925 48.4% — +9 — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.05
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2017 1613 126.9 +3.55 +1.52 1.162 53.0% — +3 +54 60.0% +0.96 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2018 1798 139.6 +3.00 +0.36 1.076 51.1% -18 -100 -125 58.3% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 -0.04
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2019 1901 146.2 +3.96 +1.65 1.124 52.4% -93 +30 -139 58.5% +0.79 15–3 (83%) 4–6 (40%) 110.1 -0.27
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 2020 1805 132.1 +1.70 -1.09 1.032 50.6% -35 +79 — 56.7% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 98.0 +1.15
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 2021 1657 123.5 +1.00 -2.75 0.932 48.5% -33 +198 +99 43.7% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 4–8 (33%) 94.0 +2.13
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 2022 1796 134.2 +2.70 -0.72 1.026 50.4% -88 +143 -60 56.3% +0.31 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 107.9 +0.20
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 2023 1807 141.5 +3.00 -1.92 0.994 49.7% -62 +90 +3 47.1% -0.20 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 -0.59
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 2024 1636 121.5 +0.25 -3.87 0.883 47.5% -6 +131 +180 35.4% -0.94 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 +0.09
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 2025 1607 111.0 -0.30 -0.75 0.832 45.5% -40 +116 — 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.57
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1938 136.0 +1.65 -1.36 0.980 49.5% -28 +38 -14 48.7% -0.08 86–63 (58%) 58–54 (52%) 109.3 +0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.