H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Laura Siegemund vs Tamara Zidansek H2H: 1-1

Laura Siegemund and Tamara Zidansek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2022 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Tamara Zidansek
Slovenia Age 28 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #231 6-3 6-3 Tamara Zidansek #27 Match data Apr 21, 2022* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Clay
Tamara Zidansek #90 6-3 6-4 Laura Siegemund #217 Match data Jul 28, 2018* QF Moscow River Cup International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Tamara Zidansek #146 #22 1,991 1,803 80 91 46.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Siegemund Tamara Zidansek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #132 1,483 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2018 7–7 50.0% #79 1,632 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2019 15–19 44.1% #65 1,642 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0 2020 6–9 40.0% #87 1,613 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2021 25–18 58.1% #30 1,726 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2022 13–19 40.6% #85 1,595 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2023 6–8 42.9% #103 1,677 0 1
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0 2024 4–6 40.0% #181 1,638 0 1
27 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0 2025 0–1 0.0% #161 1,593 0 1
28 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1 2026 4–3 57.1% #146 1,675 0 1
29 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2 — — — — — — —
38 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Siegemund Tamara Zidansek
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 4 8 12 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 16 5 21 76.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 8 9 17 47.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2024 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2026 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
29 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0% — 34 51 85 40.0% 42 33 75 56.0% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's and 164/170 of Tamara Zidansek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laura Siegemund Tamara Zidansek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 1.0 4.0 68.3% 46.5% 55.0% 50.0% 75.0% 49.2% 38.9%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 0.6 3.5 65.4% 57.7% 42.3% 44.7% 51.2% 52.5% 48.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 33/34 1.2 2.8 68.5% 58.2% 42.0% 53.9% 44.6% 53.1% 42.8%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5% 2020 15/15 0.7 3.2 68.3% 59.5% 47.5% 55.0% 48.5% 55.6% 43.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 41/43 1.2 3.7 64.9% 62.8% 45.6% 49.4% 50.9% 56.7% 45.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 30/32 1.3 3.6 63.1% 61.5% 42.8% 49.8% 48.5% 54.3% 41.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 14/14 0.5 3.7 68.0% 54.9% 43.2% 53.3% 54.1% 51.1% 46.1%
26 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0% 2024 10/10 0.4 4.5 63.5% 57.8% 38.8% 46.4% 36.2% 51.2% 40.2%
27 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0% 2026 6/7 1.7 4.7 59.6% 64.0% 44.6% 51.1% 61.9% 55.8% 47.8%
29 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1% — 164/171 1.0 3.5 65.7% 59.9% 43.7% 50.7% 48.9% 54.2% 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Siegemund Tamara Zidansek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1484 98.5 -0.11 -0.64 0.766 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.15
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1632 116.1 -1.96 +2.38 1.024 50.4% -117 +98 — 55.2% +0.24 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.28
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1642 115.3 -2.75 -0.57 0.912 48.3% -135 +147 -8 43.4% -0.60 9–8 (53%) 3–2 (60%) 101.4 -0.17
22 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13 2020 1613 128.8 -0.74 +0.40 0.974 49.8% -65 +134 — 47.2% -0.06 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 96.1 -0.44
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1727 132.9 +0.46 +0.75 1.038 50.9% -162 +227 — 54.1% +0.16 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 108.2 +0.90
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1596 120.1 -1.76 -0.99 0.907 47.9% +16 +119 -18 41.7% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 99.0 +1.49
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1678 119.9 -2.90 +0.63 0.942 48.6% -80 +129 — 48.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.0 -0.10
26 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44 2024 1638 109.0 -2.73 -2.13 0.825 45.6% -61 +156 — 36.0% -1.32 4–1 (80%) 2–0 — +0.29
27 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28 2025 1593 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05
28 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49 2026 1676 113.6 -0.32 +0.56 1.081 51.7% -13 +54 — 52.9% +0.18 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.34
29 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76 — 1804 125.5 -1.42 +0.07 0.958 49.2% -86 +154 -14 46.9% -0.34 33–32 (51%) 27–16 (63%) 106.1 +0.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.