H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Tsvetana Pironkova H2H: 1-0
Laura Siegemund holds a 1–0 lead over Tsvetana Pironkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 1-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Tsvetana Pironkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #89 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,853 | 146 | 155 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Tsvetana Pironkova | #1,170 | #31 | 1,805 | 1,770 | 171 | 225 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Siegemund | Tsvetana Pironkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #86 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #35 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #46 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #42 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #38 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #59 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #64 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #136 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #125 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |