H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Lauren Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Jamie Loeb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lauren Davis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lauren Davis won the 2025 Charleston Open first round 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Davis | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Jamie Loeb | Match data | Apr 1, 2025 | R64 | Charleston Open | WTA 500 | Clay |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,837 | 143 | 182 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jamie Loeb | #484 | #132 | 460 | 1,577 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lauren Davis | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #484 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lauren Davis | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2011 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2022 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 97 | 113 | 210 | 46.2% | 25 | 41 | 66 | 37.9% | 21 | 28 | 49 | 42.9% | — | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 304/325 of Lauren Davis's and 13/13 of Jamie Loeb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Lauren Davis | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2011 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 49.5% | 55.1% | 40.4% | 46.3% | 16.7% | 47.3% | 23.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 10/10 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 66.5% | 59.2% | 48.6% | 48.5% | 36.9% | 55.6% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 23/30 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 62.6% | 56.8% | 42.6% | 49.6% | 41.8% | 51.6% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 38/41 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 63.1% | 60.7% | 42.4% | 47.5% | 42.8% | 54.0% | 42.8% | 2015 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50.9% | 44.8% | 42.9% | 50.0% | — | 43.9% | 23.7% |
| 21 | 2015 | 29/34 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 64.0% | 63.0% | 46.0% | 43.8% | 54.2% | 56.8% | 40.7% | 2016 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 55.9% | 53.4% | 45.4% | 41.7% | 14.3% | 49.9% | 26.1% |
| 22 | 2016 | 19/24 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 59.7% | 62.9% | 44.5% | 51.5% | 50.5% | 55.7% | 45.3% | 2017 | 4/4 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 50.4% | 62.8% | 41.8% | 28.7% | 45.8% | 52.5% | 42.1% |
| 23 | 2017 | 41/42 | 1.4 | 5.6 | 60.5% | 59.3% | 40.8% | 50.4% | 56.0% | 52.1% | 47.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 8/8 | 1.5 | 6.3 | 59.3% | 57.6% | 37.5% | 54.0% | 48.6% | 49.5% | 41.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 21/21 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 61.4% | 60.2% | 48.6% | 60.3% | 50.7% | 55.7% | 41.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 14/14 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 66.5% | 57.2% | 45.3% | 49.9% | 52.1% | 53.2% | 43.2% | 2021 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 52.4% | 59.2% | 48.5% | 61.1% | 33.3% | 54.0% | 33.7% |
| 27 | 2021 | 28/28 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 55.3% | 63.8% | 44.5% | 46.1% | 45.0% | 55.1% | 42.0% | 2022 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 58.1% | 73.5% | 37.3% | 62.2% | 21.4% | 58.5% | 28.7% |
| 28 | 2022 | 30/30 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 56.8% | 64.4% | 42.8% | 50.4% | 50.5% | 54.9% | 42.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 30/30 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 61.1% | 61.0% | 45.3% | 48.1% | 52.8% | 54.9% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 5/5 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 56.6% | 48.9% | 39.4% | 44.0% | 51.9% | 43.5% | 35.7% | 2025 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 68.8% | 56.4% | 28.0% | 53.3% | 50.0% | 47.5% | 42.7% |
| 31 | 2025 | 5/5 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 57.8% | 48.9% | 44.0% | 47.2% | 43.9% | 47.3% | 41.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 304/325 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 60.8% | 60.5% | 43.8% | 49.3% | 48.9% | 53.9% | 42.7% | — | 13/14 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 54.3% | 60.3% | 42.2% | 46.9% | 31.1% | 52.3% | 34.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lauren Davis | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1469 | 96.1 | -1.99 | -3.92 | 0.448 | 35.8% | +25 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.83 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1497 | 108.5 | -1.41 | -0.02 | 0.967 | 49.1% | +2 | +46 | — | 42.9% | -0.10 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1576 | 111.7 | -3.39 | -2.88 | 0.824 | 45.7% | +11 | -54 | -36 | 40.6% | -1.01 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–2 (75%) | 108.1 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 1654 | 126.2 | -1.49 | -0.23 | 0.930 | 48.3% | -1 | -154 | +33 | 51.1% | -0.11 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–1 (83%) | 105.7 | +0.07 | 2015 | 1497 | 102.9 | +2.82 | +1.02 | 0.422 | 35.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1580 | 117.4 | -0.82 | -0.57 | 0.941 | 48.6% | -2 | -59 | +76 | 36.0% | -1.15 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–4 (64%) | 103.8 | -1.82 | 2016 | 1501 | 99.5 | -1.29 | -5.38 | 0.522 | 38.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1699 | 128.3 | -1.36 | +1.29 | 1.023 | 50.4% | +49 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.29 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.7 | -0.31 | 2017 | 1535 | 115.6 | -1.34 | -1.45 | 0.887 | 47.6% | +41 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–2 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.10 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1624 | 128.1 | -3.03 | +3.62 | 0.995 | 50.0% | +63 | -69 | -64 | 47.4% | -0.11 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–3 (57%) | 99.9 | +0.39 | 2018 | 1520 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1603 | 108.4 | -2.94 | -0.71 | 0.824 | 45.7% | +42 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 2019 | 1472 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 1734 | 133.2 | -0.71 | -1.22 | 0.932 | 48.8% | -2 | -166 | -55 | 43.2% | -0.39 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.3 | -0.90 | 2020 | 1444 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 1623 | 118.4 | -2.04 | -0.34 | 0.923 | 48.3% | +39 | — | — | 40.6% | -0.75 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.2 | -0.17 | 2021 | 1439 | 92.5 | +1.84 | +1.86 | 0.732 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.83 | — | — | — | -0.15 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1646 | 122.0 | -1.24 | -0.82 | 0.936 | 48.4% | -3 | -115 | +89 | 42.6% | -0.66 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–3 (25%) | 101.0 | -0.59 | 2022 | 1447 | 104.9 | -0.88 | +0.62 | 0.692 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.14 |
| 28 | 2022 | 1715 | 129.3 | -1.29 | -0.08 | 0.947 | 48.7% | -7 | -84 | -9 | 42.4% | -0.62 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 99.0 | -1.24 | 2023 | 1428 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 1682 | 126.0 | -1.26 | -0.82 | 0.950 | 48.9% | +20 | -11 | -71 | 50.7% | -0.24 | 5–8 (38%) | 6–0 (100%) | 100.9 | -0.58 | 2024 | 1391 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 1625 | 96.9 | -3.79 | -3.39 | 0.631 | 39.9% | — | — | — | 9.1% | -3.18 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.30 | 2025 | 1422 | 105.4 | -1.30 | -3.22 | 0.813 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1593 | 110.2 | -1.83 | -2.46 | 0.794 | 44.6% | +38 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 2–0 | — | — | 0.00 | 2026 | 1410 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1838 | 128.2 | -1.76 | -0.15 | 0.925 | 48.3% | +20 | -77 | +9 | 43.9% | -0.54 | 53–48 (52%) | 39–29 (57%) | 108.1 | -1.56 | — | 1578 | 106.4 | -0.20 | -0.92 | 0.719 | 44.1% | +41 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.66 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–4 (20%) | 92.9 | -2.71 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sloane Stephens | 3 | 3 | 6 | Aug 23, 2023 | H2H |
| Danka Kovinic | 3 | 2 | 5 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 26, 2023 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 19, 2022 | H2H |
| Madison Keys | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 23, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 2, 2018 | H2H |
| Lauren Davis | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Xiyu Wang | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 24, 2022 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 9, 2022 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 1, 2021 | H2H |