H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Lauren Davis vs Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Lauren Davis vs Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove | #530 | #135 | 507 | 1,586 | 7 | 21 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lauren Davis | Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #158 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #232 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |