H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lauren Davis vs Na Li H2H: 0-1

Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 Cincinnati Open round of 32 4-6 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #5 4-6 6-1 6-1 Lauren Davis #76 Match data Aug 15, 2013* R32 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lauren Davis Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 — — — — — — — 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lauren Davis Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9% — — — — — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 304/325 of Lauren Davis's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lauren Davis Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7% 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8% 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
Career — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7% — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lauren Davis Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
Career — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56 — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.