H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 0-2

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 2–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2018 Australian Open second round 2-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Agnieszka Radwanska
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Agnieszka Radwanska #35 2-6 7-5 6-3 Lesia Tsurenko #43 Match data Jan 18, 2018* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Agnieszka Radwanska #3 6-1 6-0 Lesia Tsurenko #105 Match data May 25, 2012* R16 Brussels Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,103 513 241 68.0% 0 5 1 7 7 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,672 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,809 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2008 52–20 72.2% #10 1,914 0 4
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,912 0 4
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,862 0 4
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,980 0 7
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0 2012 59–20 74.7% #4 1,988 0 10
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,966 0 13
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,877 0 14
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,961 0 17
27 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2 2016 53–19 73.6% #3 1,980 0 20
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,823 0 20
29 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4 2018 15–14 51.7% #74 1,752 0 20
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Agnieszka Radwanska
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 18 10 28 64.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 30 14 44 68.2% 14 5 19 73.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
20 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 28 16 44 63.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 25 12 37 67.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 36 12 48 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 41 13 54 75.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
24 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 46 15 61 75.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 31 16 47 66.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 36 16 52 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — —
27 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 43 13 56 76.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2018 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1% — — — — — 370 166 536 69.0% 75 45 120 62.5% 66 28 94 70.2% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 651/755 of Agnieszka Radwanska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Agnieszka Radwanska
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 10/19 1.8 1.6 65.4% 59.8% 46.5% 60.6% 47.1% 55.1% 46.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 41/46 2.0 1.8 60.6% 62.9% 47.7% 57.5% 43.5% 57.3% 44.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 59/72 1.4 1.4 67.0% 63.2% 46.8% 50.4% 54.4% 57.9% 49.2%
20 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6% 2009 64/67 1.5 1.5 66.3% 62.9% 48.9% 52.1% 56.0% 58.2% 48.9%
21 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6% 2010 49/50 1.6 1.2 65.6% 64.1% 50.5% 51.5% 47.9% 59.2% 48.8%
22 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4% 2011 56/64 2.3 1.2 67.1% 64.4% 51.4% 58.4% 54.0% 59.9% 49.6%
23 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7% 2012 68/79 2.4 1.2 67.3% 66.3% 46.7% 56.9% 56.1% 59.9% 49.0%
24 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8% 2013 69/76 2.4 1.6 64.9% 65.6% 50.7% 55.0% 53.1% 60.4% 48.1%
25 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5% 2014 60/65 2.4 1.3 65.5% 63.3% 48.2% 56.8% 52.0% 58.2% 49.8%
26 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8% 2015 49/72 2.5 1.3 66.7% 68.4% 51.3% 56.8% 54.6% 62.7% 46.7%
27 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5% 2016 60/73 2.8 1.8 62.4% 67.3% 47.7% 60.1% 57.3% 60.0% 49.8%
28 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4% 2017 42/43 2.0 1.6 61.8% 64.9% 45.8% 53.6% 46.7% 57.5% 46.3%
29 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0% 2018 24/29 1.4 1.9 60.8% 59.8% 44.2% 45.6% 42.6% 53.4% 43.2%
30 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7% — 651/755 2.1 1.5 65.1% 64.6% 48.5% 55.1% 52.4% 59.0% 48.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Agnieszka Radwanska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1673 141.6 +0.60 +1.54 1.026 50.8% -31 -111 +25 58.1% +0.40 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.3 -0.39
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1810 145.1 +1.25 +1.05 1.037 50.9% -9 -215 -55 57.7% +0.58 8–8 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 104.1 -0.85
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1914 152.0 +2.51 +4.81 1.167 53.4% -49 -105 +11 66.0% +1.18 14–7 (67%) 7–7 (50%) 104.2 +0.97
20 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15 2009 1913 151.3 +2.63 +4.78 1.172 53.5% -27 -59 +42 62.8% +0.99 11–9 (55%) 4–10 (29%) 92.8 +1.49
21 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08 2010 1862 156.5 +3.54 +5.02 1.197 53.9% +37 -47 +77 66.0% +1.38 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 91.3 +2.07
22 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34 2011 1980 161.2 +4.42 +6.19 1.237 54.8% +22 -148 -85 67.3% +1.27 12–11 (52%) 6–9 (40%) 94.9 +2.26
23 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05 2012 1989 163.4 +4.85 +5.61 1.223 54.4% +44 -42 -81 72.4% +1.53 11–7 (61%) 5–3 (63%) 99.8 +0.14
24 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31 2013 1966 161.1 +5.04 +4.68 1.217 54.2% +44 -43 -7 70.9% +1.54 10–5 (67%) 12–5 (71%) 103.6 +1.71
25 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32 2014 1877 160.3 +2.22 +5.84 1.190 53.9% +20 +68 +42 63.6% +1.24 8–7 (53%) 7–5 (58%) 99.1 +1.73
26 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25 2015 1962 156.6 +4.09 +5.26 1.249 54.7% +2 -94 -3 67.3% +1.52 9–13 (41%) 3–6 (33%) 90.4 -0.24
27 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38 2016 1980 161.7 +4.05 +6.47 1.245 54.9% +48 -113 -53 72.2% +1.73 8–10 (44%) 8–6 (57%) 94.0 +0.07
28 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57 2017 1823 139.7 +1.38 +2.93 1.090 51.9% +30 +27 +110 57.7% +0.56 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 +1.52
29 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69 2018 1752 134.0 -1.95 +0.83 0.927 48.2% +14 — +160 47.6% -0.17 7–2 (78%) 4–1 (80%) 107.0 -0.80
30 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84 — 2104 161.3 +3.16 +4.74 1.175 53.6% +16 -74 +8 65.6% +1.20 107–96 (53%) 70–61 (53%) 95.2 +1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.