H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 1-0

Lesia Tsurenko holds a 1–0 lead over Alizé Cornet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lesia Tsurenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2015 Indian Wells Open third round 7-5 1-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Alizé Cornet
France Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lesia Tsurenko #85 7-5 1-6 6-2 Alizé Cornet #24 Match data Mar 16, 2015* R32 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 379 361 51.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Alizé Cornet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 36–22 62.1% #16 1,781 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,662 0 1
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,561 0 1
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2012 22–20 52.4% #44 1,640 0 2
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,791 0 4
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,631 0 4
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1 2016 22–21 51.2% #41 1,704 0 5
27 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2 2017 24–22 52.2% #38 1,754 0 5
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3 2018 23–24 48.9% #45 1,689 0 6
29 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4 2019 24–20 54.5% #59 1,698 0 6
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,771 0 6
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4 2021 24–24 50.0% #61 1,744 0 6
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,752 0 6
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4 2023 12–18 40.0% #117 1,671 0 6
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,607 0 6
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,554 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Alizé Cornet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 12 13 25 48.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 7 8 15 46.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 17 15 32 53.1% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 28 16 44 63.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 16 18 34 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2019 13 11 24 54.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
30 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2020 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 16 15 31 51.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
32 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 16 16 32 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2023 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
34 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2024 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1% — — — — — 217 208 425 51.1% 122 107 229 53.3% 33 38 71 46.5% 7 8 15 46.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 665/741 of Alizé Cornet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Alizé Cornet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 2/2 1.5 1.5 58.6% 56.3% 41.2% 45.0% 34.8% 49.8% 41.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 1.3 6.7 58.0% 57.6% 45.5% 62.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 8/17 1.4 4.8 57.0% 61.7% 36.5% 46.8% 39.4% 50.8% 47.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 48/58 2.4 3.1 59.4% 64.4% 43.4% 55.4% 56.2% 55.9% 47.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 43/44 1.9 4.9 55.0% 59.8% 44.5% 47.9% 44.7% 52.9% 45.0%
20 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6% 2010 32/37 2.3 3.6 60.6% 63.2% 40.3% 52.0% 47.3% 54.3% 45.9%
21 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6% 2011 26/27 2.2 5.1 59.0% 59.3% 40.6% 51.5% 55.2% 51.6% 45.2%
22 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4% 2012 36/42 1.2 4.7 61.0% 60.7% 40.8% 49.1% 53.9% 52.8% 48.2%
23 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7% 2013 51/62 2.1 4.7 60.5% 61.5% 44.5% 54.0% 52.2% 54.8% 47.0%
24 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8% 2014 52/61 1.5 5.0 62.9% 63.4% 45.2% 49.6% 51.5% 56.5% 47.0%
25 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5% 2015 42/49 1.8 5.9 65.7% 62.3% 48.9% 48.9% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1%
26 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8% 2016 35/43 1.5 5.5 63.1% 62.7% 41.0% 58.8% 51.0% 54.5% 44.7%
27 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5% 2017 41/46 1.0 4.3 64.3% 59.3% 41.1% 52.6% 51.7% 52.9% 47.4%
28 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4% 2018 45/47 1.2 3.6 65.2% 60.9% 45.3% 52.0% 50.6% 55.5% 44.7%
29 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0% 2019 44/44 1.5 3.2 63.1% 63.5% 46.3% 51.5% 50.0% 57.1% 47.8%
30 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8% 2020 22/22 2.2 4.7 62.6% 66.3% 42.6% 56.0% 51.4% 57.5% 44.4%
31 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8% 2021 47/49 1.6 4.5 63.0% 62.7% 42.0% 52.0% 51.8% 54.8% 45.9%
32 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3% 2022 49/49 2.2 4.6 58.7% 65.5% 45.2% 51.7% 48.8% 57.2% 44.0%
33 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1% 2023 30/30 1.5 5.3 63.6% 61.9% 42.7% 52.0% 54.8% 54.8% 43.2%
34 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3% 2024 8/8 1.4 5.6 58.6% 57.6% 36.6% 52.0% 36.2% 48.6% 39.2%
35 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7% 2025 1/1 0.0 5.0 50.9% 51.9% 23.1% 0.0% 16.7% 37.7% 38.3%
Career — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7% — 665/741 1.7 4.5 61.6% 62.2% 43.5% 51.9% 50.9% 55.0% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Alizé Cornet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1516 106.6 -1.79 +1.78 0.836 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 1–0 — -0.03
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1510 102.3 -1.61 -2.20 0.893 47.7% — — — 37.5% -0.87 1–1 — — +0.29
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1570 120.8 -1.99 +1.24 0.957 48.9% -48 +43 — 48.7% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1782 146.7 +0.62 +3.01 1.067 51.6% -112 +74 — 59.5% +0.78 11–8 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 107.5 -0.33
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1663 128.7 -2.23 +1.23 0.955 49.3% +16 +59 — 45.1% -0.31 8–6 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.18
20 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15 2010 1611 121.0 -1.21 +1.16 1.003 50.1% +7 +76 — 48.8% +0.02 4–8 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.69
21 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08 2011 1562 123.0 -3.16 +0.65 0.933 48.4% +57 +60 — 39.3% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 94.7 -1.01
22 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34 2012 1640 126.5 -2.48 +2.74 1.023 50.5% -34 +105 -109 50.0% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 108.0 +0.06
23 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05 2013 1731 137.4 -0.53 +2.45 1.040 51.0% -10 +13 -220 54.9% +0.32 12–10 (55%) 10–5 (67%) 106.1 +0.65
24 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31 2014 1792 145.4 +0.93 +3.61 1.080 51.7% +29 -135 -154 54.2% +0.46 17–9 (65%) 8–12 (40%) 104.0 -0.76
25 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32 2015 1631 126.7 -0.36 +1.69 1.041 50.7% +22 +52 -29 47.9% -0.03 10–11 (48%) 1–7 (13%) 91.6 +1.81
26 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25 2016 1704 131.6 -0.75 +1.42 0.982 49.8% +19 -93 -99 48.9% +0.14 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.07
27 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38 2017 1755 137.4 -2.79 +3.62 1.006 50.0% +35 -111 -216 51.0% +0.11 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.01
28 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57 2018 1689 134.8 -1.25 +1.50 1.004 50.1% -15 +85 -137 48.1% -0.04 6–8 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.03
29 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69 2019 1699 130.0 +0.27 +3.19 1.115 52.5% -21 +47 -95 56.7% +0.59 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +1.36
30 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24 2020 1771 138.5 +0.58 +1.50 1.044 51.5% +8 -35 — 55.3% +0.64 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 103.6 +0.16
31 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91 2021 1744 132.4 -0.78 +2.82 1.016 50.4% +5 -128 -57 48.1% +0.06 10–4 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 106.9 -1.70
32 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04 2022 1753 141.3 +0.38 +1.27 1.028 50.7% -22 -126 +32 55.3% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 +0.59
33 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59 2023 1671 113.6 -1.47 -0.64 0.957 49.0% -36 -30 +86 39.4% -0.37 7–4 (64%) 2–7 (22%) 98.9 +0.47
34 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77 2024 1607 107.6 -3.28 -1.77 0.763 44.3% -37 +7 — 16.7% -2.50 1–1 — — -0.48
35 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10 2025 1554 97.7 +1.43 +0.15 0.615 38.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01
Career — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84 — 1884 138.4 -0.83 +2.02 1.016 50.4% -1 +21 -65 50.3% +0.12 127–114 (53%) 74–76 (49%) 101.7 0.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.