H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Martina Trevisan
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Lesia Tsurenko vs Martina Trevisan.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesia Tsurenko | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |