H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Richel Hogenkamp H2H: 0-1

Richel Hogenkamp holds a 1–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richel Hogenkamp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richel Hogenkamp won the 2013 Bastad round of 16 6-1 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Richel Hogenkamp
The Netherlands Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richel Hogenkamp #278 6-1 2-6 6-3 Lesia Tsurenko #60 Match data Jul 19, 2013* R16 Bastad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Richel Hogenkamp #1,297 #94 654 1,581 14 28 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Richel Hogenkamp
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2012 1–1 50.0% #197 1,513 0 0
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2013 2–2 50.0% #213 1,524 0 0
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2014 1–1 50.0% #138 1,530 0 0
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0 2015 2–7 22.2% #132 1,495 0 0
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0 2016 3–3 50.0% #133 1,548 0 0
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0 2017 5–8 38.5% #106 1,537 0 0
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1 2018 0–5 0.0% #167 1,514 0 0
27 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2 2019 0–1 0.0% #195 1,478 0 0
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Richel Hogenkamp
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1% — 4 13 17 23.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 40/42 of Richel Hogenkamp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Richel Hogenkamp
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6% 2012 2/2 2.0 8.5 48.8% 65.9% 48.9% 56.3% 43.2% 57.0% 36.8%
21 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6% 2013 3/4 1.0 6.3 57.2% 55.4% 46.8% 57.9% 78.0% 52.0% 45.5%
22 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4% 2014 2/2 1.5 5.5 64.9% 56.6% 37.3% 55.0% 65.3% 50.3% 48.5%
23 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7% 2015 8/9 0.9 3.1 59.2% 60.5% 48.0% 55.2% 51.4% 55.8% 34.4%
24 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8% 2016 6/6 0.8 4.8 55.6% 63.8% 49.0% 61.8% 57.0% 57.1% 45.2%
25 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5% 2017 13/13 1.8 2.9 59.1% 62.5% 49.4% 47.9% 42.7% 57.2% 39.2%
26 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8% 2018 5/5 1.0 4.0 55.4% 55.2% 40.6% 47.6% 31.3% 48.4% 34.0%
27 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5% 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 61.5% 54.2% 43.3% 50.0% 42.9% 50.0% 43.3%
28 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7% — 40/42 1.3 4.1 57.8% 60.5% 47.0% 53.0% 49.0% 54.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Richel Hogenkamp
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15 2012 1513 105.3 +0.72 -1.37 0.857 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — -0.17
21 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08 2013 1525 101.1 -1.26 -0.60 0.947 49.5% — +62 — 44.4% -0.45 1–0 — — +0.05
22 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34 2014 1530 104.8 -1.97 -1.72 0.975 49.3% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01
23 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05 2015 1496 108.3 -1.68 -2.17 0.778 45.4% -26 +70 — 26.3% -1.68 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.22
24 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31 2016 1549 112.0 -0.08 +0.20 1.052 51.5% — — — 57.1% +0.50 0–2 — — -0.05
25 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32 2017 1538 106.6 +0.40 -2.44 0.917 48.4% -45 — +57 39.3% -0.64 1–1 0–2 — -0.12
26 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25 2018 1514 95.9 -2.74 -3.00 0.659 41.5% — +56 — 9.1% -3.36 0–1 0–2 — -0.20
27 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38 2019 1479 104.6 +0.93 +3.09 0.867 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
28 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57 2020 1482 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24 2022 1468 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84 — 1581 108.2 -0.69 -1.69 0.874 47.4% -39 +63 +57 35.9% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 0–8 (0%) 92.3 -1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.