H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Lesia Tsurenko vs Simona Halep H2H: 0-8

Simona Halep holds a 8–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Simona Halep leads 4–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Simona Halep won the 2022 Birmingham third round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesia Tsurenko
UKR Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 8
8 main draw meetings
Simona Halep
ROU Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 2022* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Simona Halep #20 6-1 6-4 Lesia Tsurenko #116 Match data
Jun 1, 2019* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Simona Halep #3 6-2 6-1 Lesia Tsurenko #27 Match data
Feb 21, 2019* Dubai WTA 1000 R16 Hard Simona Halep #2 6-3 7-5 Lesia Tsurenko #23 Match data
Feb 14, 2019* Doha WTA 1000 R16 Hard Simona Halep #3 6-2 6-3 Lesia Tsurenko #24 Match data
Aug 18, 2018* Cincinnati WTA 1000 QF Hard Simona Halep #1 6-4 6-1 Lesia Tsurenko #44 Match data
Jun 27, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Simona Halep #3 6-3 4-6 6-4 Lesia Tsurenko #170 Match data
Jun 22, 2013* 's Hertogenbosch WTA 250 QF Grass Simona Halep #45 6-3 6-1 Lesia Tsurenko #78 Match data
Oct 11, 2012* Linz WTA 500 R32 Hard Simona Halep #46 3-0 (ret.) Lesia Tsurenko #102 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lesia Tsurenko #370 #23 2,030 1,889 180 200 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Simona Halep #873 #1 8,290 2,111 446 197 69.4% 2 10 1 2 9 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesia Tsurenko Simona Halep
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2010 7–9 43.8% #84 1,552 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2011 16–22 42.1% #47 1,592 0 0
20 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0 2012 23–23 50.0% #47 1,699 0 0
21 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0 2013 50–17 74.6% #11 2,004 0 6
22 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0 2014 46–18 71.9% #3 1,969 0 8
23 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,485 0 0 2015 49–16 75.4% #2 1,929 0 11
24 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,507 0 0 2016 41–14 74.5% #4 1,997 0 14
25 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,511 0 0 2017 44–18 71.0% #1 1,973 0 15
26 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,738 0 1 2018 45–12 78.9% #1 2,005 1 18
27 2016 19–19 50.0% #57 1,728 0 2 2019 39–16 70.9% #4 1,938 2 19
28 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,699 0 3 2020 23–3 88.5% #2 2,056 2 22
29 2018 26–18 59.1% #27 1,814 0 4 2021 24–13 64.9% #20 1,949 2 22
30 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,734 0 4 2022 39–13 75.0% #10 1,986 2 24
31 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,738 0 4 2024 0–2 0.0% #873 1,913 2 24
33 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,745 0 4 2025 0–1 0.0% #873 1,887 2 24
34 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,866 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,693 0 4 — — — — — — —