Lesia Tsurenko
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | 0 | 8 | 8 | Jun 16, 2022 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 16, 2022 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 3, 2018 | H2H |
| Varvara Lepchenko | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 28, 2024 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Lesia Tsurenko vs Yingying Duan H2H: 0-1
Yingying Duan holds a 1–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yingying Duan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yingying Duan won the 2017 Tianjin first round 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Yingying Duan | Match data | Feb 17, 2018 | Q1 | Dubai Tennis Championships | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Yingying Duan | 6-4 7-6(2) | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data | Oct 12, 2017* | R32 | Tianjin | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | #386 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,898 | 180 | 202 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,654 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lesia Tsurenko | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #27 | 1,808 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Lesia Tsurenko | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2014 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2015 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2013 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2016 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2014 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2017 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 2015 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2018 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2016 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2019 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 122 | 127 | 249 | 49.0% | 34 | 48 | 82 | 41.5% | 24 | 27 | 51 | 47.1% | Career | 32 | 46 | 78 | 41.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
Performance Progression by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's and 85/92 of Yingying Duan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Lesia Tsurenko | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2009 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 67.3% | 54.3% | 41.2% | 55.6% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 38.6% | 2012 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 64.1% | 67.9% | 49.1% | 85.0% | 45.8% | 61.7% | 42.0% |
| 2010 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 61.0% | 59.3% | 41.5% | 45.5% | 53.9% | 52.3% | 39.6% | 2013 | 5/5 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 65.5% | 58.9% | 40.6% | 29.4% | 56.0% | 52.3% | 42.5% |
| 2011 | 10/10 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 66.1% | 57.8% | 37.4% | 47.0% | 48.7% | 50.7% | 44.4% | 2014 | 5/7 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 61.4% | 60.9% | 46.0% | 57.6% | 51.7% | 54.9% | 39.8% |
| 2012 | 17/19 | 0.6 | 6.3 | 61.4% | 56.3% | 38.9% | 40.3% | 55.0% | 49.7% | 45.7% | 2015 | 9/13 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 61.2% | 71.3% | 44.9% | 55.4% | 39.5% | 60.8% | 39.4% |
| 2013 | 27/29 | 1.3 | 5.2 | 61.6% | 59.8% | 45.0% | 44.2% | 53.6% | 54.0% | 45.8% | 2016 | 14/15 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 65.4% | 66.2% | 44.5% | 56.6% | 43.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% |
| 2014 | 12/12 | 2.3 | 5.6 | 58.7% | 59.9% | 45.7% | 52.5% | 41.0% | 54.5% | 42.5% | 2017 | 28/28 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 67.2% | 61.1% | 42.7% | 52.1% | 48.3% | 55.1% | 39.7% |
| 2015 | 31/39 | 1.5 | 4.3 | 69.1% | 63.2% | 53.5% | 55.0% | 49.7% | 59.5% | 44.8% | 2018 | 16/16 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 67.8% | 63.8% | 37.4% | 61.2% | 47.4% | 55.7% | 41.0% |
| 2016 | 35/39 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 64.8% | 60.5% | 44.8% | 50.5% | 53.2% | 54.9% | 45.5% | 2019 | 5/5 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 63.1% | 64.4% | 40.2% | 43.6% | 33.0% | 55.4% | 35.6% |
| 2017 | 44/46 | 1.6 | 4.1 | 65.6% | 61.5% | 44.4% | 49.1% | 52.0% | 55.6% | 45.4% | 2020 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 70.4% | 60.5% | 43.8% | 62.5% | 50.0% | 55.6% | 24.5% |
| 2018 | 41/45 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 64.4% | 61.8% | 46.5% | 54.0% | 47.5% | 56.2% | 46.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 28/28 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 69.7% | 59.1% | 43.8% | 51.0% | 54.3% | 54.4% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 3/4 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 65.0% | 53.6% | 42.6% | 35.2% | 43.8% | 50.0% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 16/16 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 65.8% | 55.1% | 43.1% | 45.6% | 55.2% | 51.2% | 49.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19/21 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 64.4% | 53.7% | 43.8% | 49.8% | 49.2% | 49.9% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 37/40 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 66.2% | 57.5% | 43.0% | 47.8% | 54.7% | 52.7% | 50.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 28/30 | 0.2 | 4.9 | 63.5% | 55.1% | 40.2% | 47.0% | 46.8% | 49.5% | 43.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 353/383 | 1.1 | 4.3 | 65.1% | 59.1% | 44.4% | 49.2% | 51.1% | 53.9% | 45.7% | Career | 85/92 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 65.7% | 63.7% | 42.3% | 54.3% | 46.1% | 56.4% | 40.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Lesia Tsurenko | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2009 | 1483 | 96.1 | -0.16 | -0.74 | 0.771 | 43.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 | 2012 | 1508 | 106.9 | -0.29 | -0.87 | 1.098 | 51.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 |
| 2010 | 1468 | 101.2 | -1.44 | -1.76 | 0.831 | 46.3% | — | +62 | — | 25.0% | -1.88 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.08 | 2013 | 1511 | 104.6 | -0.82 | -0.25 | 0.890 | 47.5% | +21 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.45 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.08 |
| 2011 | 1468 | 104.4 | -3.16 | -0.61 | 0.900 | 47.5% | +23 | +64 | — | 23.5% | -1.41 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.34 | 2014 | 1477 | 101.2 | -1.58 | -1.40 | 0.882 | 47.6% | +14 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.60 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.69 |
| 2012 | 1485 | 109.3 | -4.45 | +0.03 | 0.909 | 47.7% | 0 | +73 | — | 40.9% | -0.71 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.4 | +0.05 | 2015 | 1517 | 106.8 | +0.96 | -1.58 | 1.004 | 49.9% | -2 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.33 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 98.5 | +0.60 |
| 2013 | 1505 | 119.0 | -1.69 | +1.15 | 0.995 | 49.9% | +10 | -7 | +46 | 40.6% | -0.36 | 4–6 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.5 | +0.31 | 2016 | 1538 | 108.9 | +0.86 | -0.78 | 1.017 | 50.6% | -26 | — | — | 48.6% | -0.06 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | +1.24 |
| 2014 | 1510 | 105.5 | -1.40 | -0.49 | 0.933 | 48.6% | -11 | — | — | 36.7% | -0.70 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.7 | +0.32 | 2017 | 1583 | 117.0 | -0.51 | -2.33 | 0.883 | 47.6% | +30 | -93 | -6 | 39.3% | -0.93 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.8 | +0.64 |
| 2015 | 1721 | 139.7 | +1.11 | +2.63 | 1.105 | 52.2% | +8 | — | -177 | 59.3% | +0.80 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–5 (55%) | 102.2 | +0.25 | 2018 | 1573 | 127.1 | -0.70 | -1.07 | 0.927 | 48.5% | +3 | — | — | 39.5% | -0.55 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.27 |
| 2016 | 1725 | 125.5 | -0.94 | +1.32 | 1.009 | 50.2% | +25 | -190 | -217 | 50.6% | +0.07 | 7–3 (70%) | 3–6 (33%) | 103.6 | +1.38 | 2019 | 1542 | 109.9 | -0.01 | -4.94 | 0.799 | 45.8% | +17 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.67 | 1–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.18 |
| 2017 | 1689 | 134.1 | -0.08 | +2.63 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +20 | -134 | -107 | 47.9% | -0.10 | 5–7 (42%) | 7–6 (54%) | 100.9 | -1.57 | 2020 | 1533 | 102.9 | +0.45 | -3.00 | 0.551 | 40.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 2018 | 1808 | 142.9 | -0.18 | +2.84 | 1.051 | 51.2% | +2 | -219 | -158 | 60.4% | +0.77 | 8–3 (73%) | 5–3 (63%) | 106.6 | +0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1736 | 136.2 | -1.34 | +1.80 | 0.981 | 49.5% | +99 | -130 | -117 | 46.6% | -0.22 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.6 | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1767 | 118.5 | +0.32 | +2.54 | 0.856 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -1.14 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1746 | 128.4 | -2.98 | +2.74 | 1.009 | 50.1% | +22 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.44 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1766 | 127.9 | -3.73 | +2.57 | 0.901 | 47.5% | -41 | -82 | -3 | 57.5% | +0.18 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.9 | -1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1870 | 139.4 | -2.54 | +6.34 | 1.063 | 51.5% | -23 | -32 | -93 | 62.0% | +0.68 | 7–2 (78%) | 3–1 (75%) | 107.3 | -1.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 1697 | 119.9 | -5.55 | +0.83 | 0.866 | 46.6% | +16 | +33 | — | 41.4% | -0.93 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1898 | 136.0 | -1.67 | +2.21 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +13 | -65 | -90 | 49.5% | -0.03 | 56–47 (54%) | 36–36 (50%) | 105.0 | -0.84 | Career | 1655 | 118.7 | -0.20 | -1.71 | 0.920 | 48.4% | +8 | -93 | -6 | 40.4% | -0.66 | 12–16 (43%) | 11–15 (42%) | 97.2 | +3.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Yingying Duan
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 10, 2019 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 12, 2019 | H2H |
| Zarina Diyas | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 8, 2020 | H2H |
| Luksika Kumkhum | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 13, 2018 | H2H |
| Lin Zhu | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 26, 2018 | H2H |