H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Leylah Fernandez vs Ann Li H2H: 1-2
Ann Li holds a 2–1 lead over Leylah Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ann Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leylah Fernandez won the 2026 Madrid fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 26
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Leylah Fernandez | 6-3 6-2 | Ann Li | Match data |
| Feb 8, 2026 | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ann Li | 6-4 6-3 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2025 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ann Li | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Ann Li | #31 | #29 | 1,625 | 1,845 | 88 | 80 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leylah Fernandez | Ann Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #47 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #129 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #169 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #96 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #31 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |