H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 04:32 UTC
Linda Fruhvirtova vs Danka Kovinic H2H: 1-0
Linda Fruhvirtova holds a 1–0 lead over Danka Kovinic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Fruhvirtova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Fruhvirtova won the 2022 Miami first round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 21
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2022* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Linda Fruhvirtova | 6-0 6-4 | Danka Kovinic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Fruhvirtova | #184 | #49 | 1,050 | 1,721 | 41 | 53 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Fruhvirtova | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #747 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2021 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #279 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2022 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2025 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2026 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |