H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Tiantian Sun in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Amelia Island round of 32 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 7-5 | Tiantian Sun | Match data | Apr 8, 2004* | R32 | Amelia Island | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,374 | 711 | 191 | 78.8% | 3 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 26 | 13 | 55 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,649 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lindsay Davenport | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,041 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,964 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #9 | 2,065 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,166 | 0 | 13 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,286 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,327 | 2 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 57–14 | 80.3% | #2 | 2,253 | 3 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,298 | 3 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,165 | 3 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,074 | 3 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,208 | 3 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,215 | 3 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,132 | 3 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,156 | 3 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,111 | 3 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Lindsay Davenport | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1991 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2004 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 21 | 6 | 27 | 77.8% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2005 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2006 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 29 | 6 | 35 | 82.9% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2007 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 36 | 8 | 44 | 81.8% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 2008 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 43 | 7 | 50 | 86.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 33 | 8 | 41 | 80.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 7 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 41 | 9 | 50 | 82.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 51 | 9 | 60 | 85.0% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 21 | 8 | 29 | 72.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 30 | 10 | 40 | 75.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 40 | 5 | 45 | 88.9% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 38 | 7 | 45 | 84.4% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 21 | 8 | 29 | 72.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 13 | 1 | 14 | 92.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 81.8% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 471 | 116 | 587 | 80.2% | 106 | 33 | 139 | 76.3% | 55 | 16 | 71 | 77.5% | 79 | 26 | 105 | 75.2% | Career | 22 | 41 | 63 | 34.9% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 114/278 of Lindsay Davenport's and 28/56 of Tiantian Sun's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Lindsay Davenport | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2003 | 13/63 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 57.5% | 72.0% | 48.9% | 70.1% | 61.3% | 62.1% | 50.3% | 2003 | 1/9 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.4% | 60.5% | 30.8% | 28.6% | 28.6% | 48.4% | 40.0% |
| 2004 | 20/74 | 4.7 | 3.3 | 61.0% | 76.7% | 48.0% | 71.2% | 55.1% | 65.5% | 51.1% | 2006 | 9/24 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 67.2% | 58.1% | 44.5% | 53.0% | 49.3% | 53.8% | 37.5% |
| 2005 | 28/69 | 5.6 | 5.0 | 59.7% | 73.5% | 46.4% | 56.5% | 54.0% | 62.4% | 48.6% | 2007 | 14/18 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 65.0% | 55.8% | 43.0% | 44.6% | 35.3% | 51.3% | 40.4% |
| 2006 | 19/29 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 57.9% | 67.9% | 53.5% | 56.9% | 47.3% | 61.8% | 47.5% | 2008 | 4/5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 65.6% | 55.4% | 41.8% | 51.8% | 30.6% | 51.0% | 36.8% |
| 2007 | 9/14 | 4.9 | 3.6 | 57.3% | 72.4% | 53.0% | 46.7% | 63.5% | 64.0% | 52.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 25/29 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 58.0% | 74.4% | 51.4% | 48.4% | 54.3% | 65.2% | 47.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Lindsay Davenport | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1991 | 1505 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.71 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.02 | 2002 | 1493 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.19 |
| 1992 | 1512 | 119.7 | — | — | — | — | +67 | 0 | — | 31.3% | -1.38 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.26 | 2003 | 1451 | 101.0 | -0.20 | -1.27 | 0.776 | 43.9% | +17 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.54 |
| 1993 | 1859 | 149.8 | — | — | — | — | -28 | -178 | -240 | 61.3% | +0.93 | 11–3 (79%) | 4–4 (50%) | 111.2 | -0.48 | 2004 | 1430 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | -34 | +118 | — | 24.0% | -1.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 1994 | 2041 | 168.7 | — | — | — | — | -27 | -191 | -346 | 69.7% | +1.73 | 11–7 (61%) | 6–5 (55%) | 102.2 | -2.86 | 2005 | 1520 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | — | 57.7% | +0.69 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.62 |
| 1995 | 1964 | 155.1 | — | — | — | — | -15 | -55 | -216 | 64.4% | +1.21 | 10–5 (67%) | 1–4 (20%) | 100.2 | +0.77 | 2006 | 1629 | 131.4 | -1.14 | -2.98 | 0.811 | 45.8% | -16 | — | — | 52.7% | -0.04 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | -0.16 |
| 1996 | 2066 | 172.6 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -68 | -253 | 73.5% | +1.73 | 6–6 (50%) | 10–8 (56%) | 100.5 | -1.62 | 2007 | 1505 | 100.0 | -2.48 | -2.77 | 0.830 | 45.9% | +49 | -23 | — | 20.5% | -2.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.7 | -1.14 |
| 1997 | 2166 | 175.6 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -154 | — | 74.4% | +1.95 | 10–10 (50%) | 7–8 (47%) | 94.6 | +0.58 | 2008 | 1494 | 101.6 | -1.21 | -2.08 | 0.750 | 43.9% | +30 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.7 | +0.02 |
| 1998 | 2287 | 180.4 | — | — | — | — | +50 | -220 | -395 | 75.7% | +1.94 | 16–7 (70%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.2 | -2.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2328 | 179.8 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -263 | -303 | 82.2% | +2.53 | 8–4 (67%) | 7–2 (78%) | 101.9 | -1.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 2254 | 177.5 | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | -106 | 76.8% | +2.17 | 13–6 (68%) | 8–8 (50%) | 96.4 | -2.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 2298 | 174.7 | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | -24 | 81.0% | +2.19 | 13–4 (76%) | 9–4 (69%) | 103.0 | -1.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 2166 | 166.9 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 71.1% | +1.46 | 4–6 (40%) | 7–5 (58%) | 90.6 | -0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 2075 | 165.9 | +4.70 | +4.45 | 1.328 | 56.1% | +52 | +20 | +133 | 74.6% | +1.95 | 10–6 (63%) | 5–5 (50%) | 96.2 | -0.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 2208 | 171.1 | +7.65 | +5.05 | 1.482 | 57.9% | +54 | -118 | +45 | 83.1% | +2.56 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–3 (63%) | 100.2 | -0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 2215 | 170.5 | +5.92 | +4.60 | 1.294 | 55.2% | +26 | -49 | +49 | 79.2% | +2.00 | 16–6 (73%) | 9–7 (56%) | 103.6 | -1.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 2133 | 165.6 | +4.92 | +4.20 | 1.241 | 54.4% | +19 | — | — | 71.9% | +1.67 | 4–4 (50%) | 7–2 (78%) | 97.4 | -1.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 2157 | 145.6 | +4.78 | +3.86 | 1.472 | 58.3% | +12 | — | — | 83.9% | +2.65 | 3–0 (100%) | 1–1 | — | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 2112 | 144.2 | +7.49 | +3.10 | 1.375 | 56.0% | -6 | +44 | — | 80.0% | +2.18 | 5–0 (100%) | 1–1 | — | -0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2375 | 176.5 | +6.17 | +4.21 | 1.351 | 56.0% | +22 | -122 | -126 | 74.8% | +1.90 | 149–78 (66%) | 95–72 (57%) | 101.9 | -1.91 | Career | 1650 | 117.9 | -1.79 | -2.69 | 0.810 | 45.5% | 0 | +30 | — | 37.4% | -0.93 | 6–15 (29%) | 11–8 (58%) | 98.4 | -0.41 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venus Williams | 14 | 13 | 27 | Jul 3, 2005 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 14 | 11 | 25 | Mar 11, 2006 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 14 | 4 | 18 | Sep 23, 2006 | H2H |
| Kim Clijsters | 8 | 9 | 17 | Jun 28, 2005 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 8 | 8 | 16 | Mar 5, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 20, 2008 | H2H |
| Gisela Dulko | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 8, 2007 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Anastasia Rodionova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 6, 2008 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 20, 2007 | H2H |