H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Tiantian Sun H2H: 1-0
Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Tiantian Sun in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Amelia Island third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2004* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 7-5 | Tiantian Sun | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,650 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lindsay Davenport | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |