H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Liudmila Samsonova vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 1-0
Liudmila Samsonova holds a 1–0 lead over Aleksandra Krunic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Liudmila Samsonova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Liudmila Samsonova won the 2022 US Open third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-3 6-3 | Aleksandra Krunic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liudmila Samsonova | #69 | #12 | 2,950 | 1,971 | 161 | 133 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 86 | 117 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liudmila Samsonova | Aleksandra Krunic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #129 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #20 | 1,915 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #144 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #27 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #17 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2026 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |