H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Liudmila Samsonova vs Sara Sorribes Tormo H2H: 1-2
Sara Sorribes Tormo holds a 2–1 lead over Liudmila Samsonova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Liudmila Samsonova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Liudmila Samsonova won the 2024 Bad Homburg third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2024* | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-3 6-1 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2021* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-4 6-3 | Liudmila Samsonova | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2021* | Phillip Island Trophy | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-7(6) 6-1 7-6(4) | Liudmila Samsonova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liudmila Samsonova | #69 | #12 | 2,950 | 1,971 | 161 | 133 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liudmila Samsonova | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #129 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #20 | 1,915 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #27 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #17 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2026 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |