H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Elise Burgin H2H: 5-2

Lori Mcneil holds a 5–2 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 3–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1989 US Open round of 128 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main-draw meetings
Elise Burgin
USA Age 64 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elise Burgin #87 7-5 6-4 Lori Mcneil #23 Match data Aug 30, 1989* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lori Mcneil #11 6-4 6-4 Elise Burgin #47 Match data Aug 13, 1987* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard
Lori Mcneil #13 6-7 6-4 7-5 Elise Burgin #40 Match data Mar 26, 1987* R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #14 6-3 6-4 Elise Burgin #41 Match data Jan 16, 1987* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Lori Mcneil #14 6-1 4-6 6-2 Elise Burgin #41 Match data Jan 9, 1987* R16 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Lori Mcneil #77 6-3 6-2 Elise Burgin #37 Match data Jun 29, 1986* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Elise Burgin #27 6-2 3-6 6-2 Lori Mcneil #77 Match data May 8, 1986* R32 Houston WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Elise Burgin — #27 20 1,846 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Elise Burgin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,509 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1982 7–10 41.2% — 1,584 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1983 13–9 59.1% — 1,743 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,716 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1985 29–23 55.8% — 1,773 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,776 0 1
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,703 0 1
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,629 0 1
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,700 0 1
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,527 0 1
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,523 0 1
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,496 0 1
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Elise Burgin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 1990 5 12 17 29.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 64 77 141 45.4% 34 30 64 53.1% 26 34 60 43.3% 8 24 32 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Elise Burgin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1980 1476 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20
19 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1981 1509 111.6 — — — — +69 — — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — -0.27
20 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32 1982 1585 111.5 — — — — +15 — — 37.8% -1.19 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.39
21 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23 1983 1744 128.2 — — — — +5 — -177 54.0% +0.10 5–1 (83%) 2–0 — -0.98
22 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25 1984 1717 125.5 — — — — -22 — -104 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 -2.46
23 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70 1985 1773 137.6 — — — — -63 -52 -73 51.7% +0.03 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 106.3 -1.47
24 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98 1986 1776 142.8 — — — — -21 +19 -104 53.2% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 98.8 -2.42
25 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28 1987 1703 130.3 — — — — -18 +39 +12 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 98.4 -1.43
26 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 1988 1630 115.9 — — — — +12 — +20 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -0.24
27 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 1989 1701 132.5 — — — — -21 +35 -80 47.6% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 -1.29
28 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 1990 1569 112.5 — — — — -10 +144 +32 32.8% -1.49 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.2 -1.68
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 1991 1528 99.8 — — — — -19 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.25
30 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 1992 1524 109.4 — — — — +1 +174 — 37.5% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.25
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 1993 1497 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.02
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15 — 1846 134.4 — — — — -16 +27 -61 44.7% -0.47 47–47 (50%) 32–28 (53%) 102.8 -4.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.