H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Elise Burgin H2H: 5-2

Lori Mcneil holds a 5–2 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 3–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1989 US Open first round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Elise Burgin
USA Age 64 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 1989* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Elise Burgin #87 7-5 6-4 Lori Mcneil #23 Match data
Aug 13, 1987* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Lori Mcneil #11 6-4 6-4 Elise Burgin #47 Match data
Mar 23, 1987 Washington WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #13 6-7 6-4 7-5 Elise Burgin #40 Match data
Jan 16, 1987* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Grass Lori Mcneil #14 6-3 6-4 Elise Burgin #41 Match data
Jan 9, 1987* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Grass Lori Mcneil #14 6-1 4-6 6-2 Elise Burgin #41 Match data
Jun 29, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Lori Mcneil #77 6-3 6-2 Elise Burgin #37 Match data
May 8, 1986* Houston WTA 250 R32 Clay Elise Burgin #27 6-2 3-6 6-2 Lori Mcneil #77 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Elise Burgin #768 #27 20 1,845 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Elise Burgin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,509 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1 1982 7–10 41.2% — 1,585 0 0
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1983 13–9 59.1% — 1,744 0 0
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,715 0 0
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3 1985 29–23 55.8% #52 1,772 0 0
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,776 0 1
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,709 0 1
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,632 0 1
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,701 0 1
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,528 0 1
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,524 0 1
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,497 0 1
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11 — — — — — — —