H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Louise Field vs Elise Burgin H2H: 0-1
Elise Burgin holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Field in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1989 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1989* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 6-4 6-4 | Louise Field | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Field | Elise Burgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |