H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lourdes Domínguez Lino vs Katie Obrien H2H: 1-0
Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Katie Obrien in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2008 Palermo third round 5-7 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2008* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 5-7 6-3 6-0 | Katie Obrien | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lourdes Domínguez Lino | #1,129 | #40 | 1,305 | 1,674 | 125 | 157 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Katie Obrien | #782 | #84 | 769 | 1,514 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lourdes Domínguez Lino | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #390 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #127 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #72 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #88 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #52 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,366 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #134 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #69 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #220 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |