H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lourdes Domínguez Lino vs Renata Voracova H2H: 0-1

Renata Voracova holds a 1–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Voracova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renata Voracova won the 2011 ASB Classic round of 32 4-6 7-6(8) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Renata Voracova
Czech Republic Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Renata Voracova #81 4-6 7-6(8) 6-0 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #85 Match data Jan 6, 2011* R32 ASB Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Renata Voracova #1,041 #74 848 1,523 24 54 30.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Renata Voracova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 2–5 28.6% #128 1,462 0 0
19 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0 2003 2–5 28.6% #145 1,456 0 0
20 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0 2006 1–1 50.0% #155 1,461 0 0
23 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0 2007 4–8 33.3% #107 1,476 0 0
24 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0 2008 2–6 25.0% #147 1,453 0 0
25 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1 2009 1–1 50.0% #126 1,460 0 0
26 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1 2010 7–11 38.9% #81 1,495 0 0
27 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1 2011 3–11 21.4% #184 1,442 0 0
28 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1 2013 2–1 66.7% #212 1,467 0 0
30 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2 2014 0–2 0.0% #169 1,443 0 0
31 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2 2015 0–2 0.0% #253 1,421 0 0
32 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2 2017 0–1 0.0% #844 1,397 0 0
34 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Renata Voracova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 1 5 6 16.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
30 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — 9 29 38 23.7% 15 23 38 39.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Renata Voracova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1462 98.5 — — — — +38 +58 — 25.0% -1.13 2–0 0–1 — +0.56
19 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 2003 1457 106.1 — — — — -4 +87 — 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.20
20 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 2006 1461 97.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 — — +0.21
23 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2007 1476 104.2 -3.02 +1.07 0.952 49.1% -36 +88 — 36.0% -1.16 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.48
24 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23 2008 1453 112.0 +1.06 -1.00 0.986 49.7% -6 — — 43.5% -0.39 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.13
25 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22 2009 1461 103.2 -2.65 -0.01 0.998 50.0% — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.14
26 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29 2010 1496 107.9 -3.16 -0.52 0.884 47.5% -59 +98 — 37.8% -0.97 1–0 3–0 (100%) — +0.13
27 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03 2011 1442 103.9 -3.82 -1.25 0.821 45.3% -12 +78 — 27.3% -1.57 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — -0.08
28 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 2013 1467 105.1 +0.68 -1.22 1.235 55.0% — +81 — 66.7% +1.50 — — — +0.34
30 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42 2014 1443 99.0 -1.90 -2.01 0.637 42.4% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — +0.08
31 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00 2015 1421 94.5 -3.10 -1.02 0.826 45.0% — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 1–0 — +0.14
32 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33 2016 1408 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57 2017 1397 96.3 -2.14 +1.46 0.414 36.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
34 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51 2018 1447 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18 2019 1453 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1445 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1437 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46 — 1523 104.2 -2.60 -0.60 0.877 47.3% -18 +86 — 35.8% -1.02 9–18 (33%) 8–7 (53%) 96.7 +1.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.