Lucie Hradecka
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 6, 2016 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 16, 2017 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 25, 2016 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Makarova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 12, 2016 | H2H |
| Annika Beck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 11, 2016 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Lucie Hradecka and Gisela Dulko are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2011 Barcelona round of 16 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Hradecka | 6-4 6-3 | Gisela Dulko | Match data | Apr 29, 2011* | R16 | Barcelona | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
| Gisela Dulko | 6-1 2-6 6-1 | Lucie Hradecka | Match data | Feb 25, 2010* | R32 | Acapulco | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,725 | 92 | 121 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,797 | 192 | 181 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Gisela Dulko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,651 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,605 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #166 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Gisela Dulko | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 18.8% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 42 | 70 | 112 | 37.5% | 49 | 43 | 92 | 53.3% | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | — | — | — | — | — | 95 | 107 | 202 | 47.0% | 81 | 58 | 139 | 58.3% | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's and 229/365 of Gisela Dulko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Gisela Dulko | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1/12 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 57.5% | 58.5% | 47.9% | 57.1% | 30.8% | 54.0% | 40.2% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 9/41 | 3.0 | 4.9 | 55.9% | 67.7% | 45.0% | 46.7% | 55.4% | 58.0% | 42.7% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6/55 | 2.3 | 4.8 | 56.5% | 59.6% | 39.2% | 49.8% | 44.7% | 50.9% | 48.8% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 26/39 | 1.5 | 4.9 | 59.7% | 59.1% | 42.3% | 49.9% | 52.7% | 52.2% | 42.9% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 36/52 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 61.7% | 58.4% | 42.9% | 47.3% | 47.6% | 52.4% | 43.2% |
| 23 | 2008 | 5/7 | 4.4 | 6.2 | 51.8% | 71.1% | 42.3% | 56.1% | 51.6% | 57.2% | 44.6% | 2008 | 35/39 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 61.9% | 59.3% | 47.2% | 48.7% | 48.3% | 54.7% | 43.0% |
| 24 | 2009 | 24/25 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 53.4% | 71.1% | 49.0% | 48.0% | 44.0% | 60.8% | 42.9% | 2009 | 44/48 | 2.7 | 4.2 | 58.1% | 66.0% | 44.8% | 56.5% | 48.7% | 56.8% | 44.9% |
| 25 | 2010 | 22/22 | 4.8 | 6.0 | 50.2% | 68.4% | 45.5% | 49.2% | 38.3% | 56.1% | 38.8% | 2010 | 39/42 | 2.3 | 3.8 | 60.6% | 60.6% | 46.5% | 50.4% | 51.1% | 55.0% | 46.3% |
| 26 | 2011 | 35/36 | 6.7 | 4.6 | 52.3% | 71.6% | 44.4% | 55.6% | 47.7% | 58.6% | 41.1% | 2011 | 28/30 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 57.2% | 65.6% | 43.9% | 55.2% | 49.5% | 56.4% | 45.7% |
| 27 | 2012 | 35/35 | 6.5 | 4.9 | 53.4% | 73.2% | 46.3% | 54.8% | 44.6% | 60.8% | 38.8% | 2012 | 5/7 | 0.6 | 5.0 | 52.5% | 48.8% | 36.6% | 30.4% | 34.6% | 43.0% | 40.8% |
| 28 | 2013 | 10/16 | 3.0 | 5.9 | 55.8% | 65.2% | 37.7% | 52.7% | 36.8% | 52.7% | 35.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 6/6 | 7.7 | 6.3 | 52.3% | 77.4% | 42.9% | 66.9% | 37.6% | 61.1% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 29/34 | 6.0 | 4.9 | 56.8% | 71.5% | 49.2% | 49.7% | 47.5% | 61.6% | 39.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 18/19 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 49.6% | 69.1% | 44.0% | 48.8% | 38.7% | 56.2% | 39.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 7/7 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 53.8% | 73.2% | 46.9% | 48.6% | 38.1% | 61.0% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 54.2% | 79.5% | 36.4% | 57.1% | 40.0% | 59.7% | 33.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 66.7% | 63.9% | 55.6% | 60.0% | 55.6% | 61.1% | 53.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 193/213 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 53.1% | 71.1% | 45.8% | 52.2% | 43.6% | 59.1% | 40.0% | — | 229/373 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 59.5% | 61.5% | 44.5% | 50.8% | 49.2% | 54.5% | 44.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Gisela Dulko | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1488 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1528 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +54 | — | 46.7% | +0.27 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.54 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1516 | 103.4 | -0.14 | -1.46 | 0.874 | 47.6% | -8 | +76 | — | 36.0% | -0.44 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–3 (0%) | 99.3 | +0.47 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1706 | 135.1 | +1.79 | -0.44 | 1.017 | 50.3% | -27 | -95 | -100 | 52.9% | -0.25 | 3–4 (43%) | 9–1 (90%) | 106.2 | -0.94 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1725 | 129.6 | -1.55 | +1.29 | 0.994 | 49.6% | -23 | -48 | -80 | 55.8% | +0.32 | 11–8 (58%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.8 | +0.73 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1491 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.86 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.06 | 2006 | 1574 | 115.8 | -2.53 | -1.31 | 0.898 | 47.8% | +11 | +73 | +112 | 44.0% | -0.75 | 3–5 (38%) | 7–5 (58%) | 98.0 | +1.89 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1476 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.04 | 2007 | 1699 | 129.5 | -2.86 | -0.86 | 0.906 | 47.9% | +7 | -19 | — | 53.8% | +0.26 | 8–7 (53%) | 6–3 (67%) | 104.8 | +0.85 |
| 23 | 2008 | 1522 | 116.1 | +0.28 | -0.38 | 1.043 | 51.8% | — | +57 | — | 60.0% | +1.27 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 | 2008 | 1630 | 120.3 | -0.30 | -0.40 | 0.950 | 49.0% | -74 | +137 | +31 | 46.3% | -0.11 | 7–3 (70%) | 4–6 (40%) | 103.7 | -1.13 |
| 24 | 2009 | 1600 | 113.4 | +2.94 | -1.31 | 1.096 | 52.0% | -63 | +42 | — | 52.5% | +0.25 | 6–5 (55%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.1 | +1.41 | 2009 | 1731 | 135.0 | +0.97 | +0.64 | 1.040 | 50.8% | -69 | +46 | -30 | 55.7% | +0.42 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.2 | -0.13 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1499 | 111.9 | -0.60 | -4.41 | 0.885 | 47.5% | -50 | +122 | — | 31.9% | -0.96 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–3 (40%) | 94.3 | -0.10 | 2010 | 1687 | 136.7 | -0.13 | +2.36 | 1.028 | 50.5% | -9 | +74 | — | 49.5% | -0.11 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–9 (31%) | 96.3 | -1.55 |
| 26 | 2011 | 1581 | 128.7 | +2.75 | -1.69 | 0.993 | 49.9% | -48 | +51 | — | 50.0% | -0.07 | 3–11 (21%) | 3–5 (38%) | 94.0 | -0.58 | 2011 | 1652 | 134.5 | +0.74 | +1.84 | 1.047 | 50.8% | -36 | +153 | — | 51.6% | +0.16 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.6 | -0.48 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1653 | 123.3 | +3.46 | -3.66 | 0.991 | 49.7% | -39 | +6 | — | 51.3% | -0.09 | 3–3 (50%) | 10–5 (67%) | 104.7 | -0.15 | 2012 | 1606 | 102.0 | -2.95 | +0.27 | 0.715 | 41.8% | -21 | — | — | 15.4% | -2.54 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| 28 | 2013 | 1562 | 108.1 | -2.03 | -4.06 | 0.752 | 44.2% | -32 | +96 | — | 36.1% | -0.94 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.1 | +0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 1587 | 119.5 | +2.19 | +0.06 | 1.055 | 51.1% | -26 | — | — | 53.3% | +0.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.1 | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 1642 | 127.6 | +3.16 | -1.64 | 1.028 | 50.2% | -66 | +87 | -139 | 46.3% | -0.26 | 9–3 (75%) | 2–4 (33%) | 105.6 | -2.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 1580 | 113.8 | -0.39 | -1.79 | 0.900 | 47.8% | -16 | +88 | — | 32.5% | -0.90 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.3 | -0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 1620 | 113.7 | +2.37 | -0.32 | 1.008 | 50.4% | -16 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.38 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 1616 | 101.7 | +2.29 | +2.10 | 0.828 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 1597 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 1550 | 93.8 | +0.91 | +0.06 | 1.371 | 57.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1726 | 122.6 | +1.93 | -2.27 | 0.977 | 49.5% | -43 | +67 | -139 | 45.1% | -0.27 | 27–36 (43%) | 26–33 (44%) | 99.1 | -1.07 | — | 1798 | 133.1 | -0.56 | +0.42 | 0.974 | 49.4% | -23 | +50 | -10 | 50.4% | -0.03 | 54–43 (56%) | 44–40 (52%) | 107.2 | +0.02 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 6, 2016 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 16, 2017 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 25, 2016 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Makarova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 12, 2016 | H2H |
| Annika Beck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 11, 2016 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iveta Benesova | 2 | 6 | 8 | May 11, 2011 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 1, 2011 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 10, 2011 | H2H |
| Alona Bondarenko | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 26, 2010 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 10, 2012 | H2H |