H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lucie Hradecka vs Tereza Smitkova H2H: 1-0
Lucie Hradecka holds a 1–0 lead over Tereza Smitkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2015 Prague fourth round 6-3 4-6 7-6(11).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lucie Hradecka | 6-3 4-6 7-6(11) | Tereza Smitkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tereza Smitkova | #1,143 | #57 | 904 | 1,565 | 15 | 33 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Tereza Smitkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #262 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #267 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |