H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 2-1

Lucie Safarova holds a 2–1 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2010 Cincinnati Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
Czech Republic Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gisela Dulko #46 6-4 6-3 Lucie Safarova #26 Match data Aug 11, 2010* R64 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lucie Safarova #80 6-3 6-3 Gisela Dulko #37 Match data Jun 18, 2005* SF Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Lucie Safarova #155 7-6(3) 6-0 Gisela Dulko #39 Match data Apr 30, 2005* SF Estoril Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,930 354 273 56.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,797 192 181 51.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,527 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,664 0 2 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2004 22–19 53.7% #33 1,705 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,779 0 3 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,725 0 0
21 2008 17–20 45.9% #63 1,652 0 4 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,772 0 4 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,698 0 2
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,742 0 4 2008 18–21 46.2% #51 1,629 0 3
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,799 0 4 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,730 0 3
25 2012 27–23 54.0% #17 1,749 0 4 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,687 0 3
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,792 0 5 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,651 0 4
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,860 0 5 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,605 0 4
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,831 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2016 15–19 44.1% #62 1,698 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,797 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,758 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Safarova Gisela Dulko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2005 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2005 20 16 36 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
21 2008 11 11 22 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 2008 3 13 16 18.8% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2011 28 15 43 65.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 6 11 17 35.3% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — —
27 2014 22 15 37 59.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2015 17 14 31 54.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 25 11 36 69.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 170 377 54.9% 101 69 170 59.4% 36 28 64 56.2% 10 6 16 62.5% — 95 107 202 47.0% 81 58 139 58.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 526/627 of Lucie Safarova's and 229/365 of Gisela Dulko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Safarova Gisela Dulko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 3/24 3.3 6.3 61.3% 63.5% 37.8% 57.1% 34.5% 54.2% 33.3% 2003 1/12 2.0 5.0 57.5% 58.5% 47.9% 57.1% 30.8% 54.0% 40.2%
19 2006 22/42 4.4 4.3 59.5% 63.3% 47.8% 57.9% 34.3% 57.0% 39.7% 2004 9/41 3.0 4.9 55.9% 67.7% 45.0% 46.7% 55.4% 58.0% 42.7%
20 2007 42/44 4.2 4.2 60.1% 71.1% 46.9% 56.3% 47.7% 61.6% 42.7% 2005 6/55 2.3 4.8 56.5% 59.6% 39.2% 49.8% 44.7% 50.9% 48.8%
21 2008 23/37 3.3 5.7 60.1% 66.6% 41.4% 55.8% 37.6% 56.4% 40.7% 2006 26/39 1.5 4.9 59.7% 59.1% 42.3% 49.9% 52.7% 52.2% 42.9%
22 2009 50/55 3.5 3.6 61.3% 70.3% 50.0% 54.0% 48.5% 62.4% 42.0% 2007 36/52 1.0 4.3 61.7% 58.4% 42.9% 47.3% 47.6% 52.4% 43.2%
23 2010 49/50 3.8 3.8 64.8% 67.9% 42.6% 53.4% 44.5% 58.9% 40.0% 2008 35/39 1.4 3.5 61.9% 59.3% 47.2% 48.7% 48.3% 54.7% 43.0%
24 2011 49/57 4.4 4.5 60.0% 71.2% 49.2% 61.0% 49.1% 62.1% 39.7% 2009 44/48 2.7 4.2 58.1% 66.0% 44.8% 56.5% 48.7% 56.8% 44.9%
25 2012 43/50 3.4 4.1 62.6% 67.6% 49.4% 64.0% 44.8% 60.5% 40.9% 2010 39/42 2.3 3.8 60.6% 60.6% 46.5% 50.4% 51.1% 55.0% 46.3%
26 2013 37/48 3.2 4.1 62.7% 66.7% 46.4% 51.8% 43.1% 59.1% 40.7% 2011 28/30 2.0 4.3 57.2% 65.6% 43.9% 55.2% 49.5% 56.4% 45.7%
27 2014 58/59 4.6 4.0 62.9% 70.3% 48.6% 61.4% 45.7% 62.3% 41.7% 2012 5/7 0.6 5.0 52.5% 48.8% 36.6% 30.4% 34.6% 43.0% 40.8%
28 2015 47/52 5.4 3.6 64.5% 72.2% 55.2% 59.9% 43.2% 66.2% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 29/34 4.8 3.9 62.8% 72.1% 47.2% 54.8% 40.2% 62.5% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 53/54 6.1 3.9 61.7% 71.2% 47.6% 59.4% 46.6% 62.4% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 21/21 3.7 3.7 64.1% 68.1% 49.9% 54.0% 42.6% 61.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 526/627 4.3 4.1 62.2% 69.5% 48.1% 57.6% 44.6% 61.4% 41.0% — 229/373 1.9 4.2 59.5% 61.5% 44.5% 50.8% 49.2% 54.5% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Safarova Gisela Dulko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1528 110.5 — — — — -9 +54 — 46.7% +0.27 2–1 (67%) — — +0.54
18 2005 1664 122.6 -0.20 -3.35 0.726 43.4% -80 -54 -11 58.3% +0.52 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.2 -0.78 2003 1516 103.4 -0.14 -1.46 0.874 47.6% -8 +76 — 36.0% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 +0.47
19 2006 1625 126.1 +0.16 -2.92 0.922 48.5% -75 +74 — 47.4% -0.12 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -1.14 2004 1706 135.1 +1.79 -0.44 1.017 50.3% -27 -95 -100 52.9% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 9–1 (90%) 106.2 -0.94
20 2007 1779 146.9 +4.80 -0.13 1.112 51.9% -65 +16 -63 62.4% +0.75 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 96.2 -1.99 2005 1725 129.6 -1.55 +1.29 0.994 49.6% -23 -48 -80 55.8% +0.32 11–8 (58%) 7–5 (58%) 105.8 +0.73
21 2008 1653 117.3 +0.42 -2.52 0.932 48.4% +26 +9 — 45.5% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +1.17 2006 1574 115.8 -2.53 -1.31 0.898 47.8% +11 +73 +112 44.0% -0.75 3–5 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 +1.89
22 2009 1772 143.9 +5.70 -1.16 1.115 51.8% +20 -73 — 58.5% +0.50 5–12 (29%) 9–7 (56%) 97.7 -0.32 2007 1699 129.5 -2.86 -0.86 0.906 47.9% +7 -19 — 53.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–3 (67%) 104.8 +0.85
23 2010 1742 141.4 +3.21 -2.15 0.974 49.4% -24 +77 -109 53.1% +0.25 13–8 (62%) 6–9 (40%) 100.0 -2.46 2008 1630 120.3 -0.30 -0.40 0.950 49.0% -74 +137 +31 46.3% -0.11 7–3 (70%) 4–6 (40%) 103.7 -1.13
24 2011 1799 143.2 +5.52 -2.69 1.049 50.8% +15 -4 -201 54.2% +0.32 20–10 (67%) 7–11 (39%) 102.4 -0.94 2009 1731 135.0 +0.97 +0.64 1.040 50.8% -69 +46 -30 55.7% +0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.2 -0.13
25 2012 1749 143.1 +4.49 -1.12 1.036 50.7% 0 +128 -149 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 9–6 (60%) 101.5 +0.27 2010 1687 136.7 -0.13 +2.36 1.028 50.5% -9 +74 — 49.5% -0.11 7–8 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 -1.55
26 2013 1793 131.9 +3.17 -1.51 0.995 49.7% -13 +15 -193 55.2% +0.13 8–12 (40%) 11–6 (65%) 98.2 +0.73 2011 1652 134.5 +0.74 +1.84 1.047 50.8% -36 +153 — 51.6% +0.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -0.48
27 2014 1860 152.7 +5.54 -0.04 1.107 51.8% -25 -11 -144 58.6% +0.66 14–13 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 99.4 -2.02 2012 1606 102.0 -2.95 +0.27 0.715 41.8% -21 — — 15.4% -2.54 1–0 0–1 — -0.18
28 2015 1831 150.7 +6.98 +0.95 1.214 53.0% -25 +69 -92 59.2% +0.63 7–11 (39%) 14–18 (44%) 93.5 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1699 127.4 +3.91 -1.84 1.063 50.8% -25 +208 +26 47.2% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 100.1 +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 1797 139.6 +4.59 -0.45 1.139 52.5% +18 +47 0 62.4% +0.96 13–8 (62%) 10–11 (48%) 100.1 +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1758 134.2 +2.91 -1.66 1.027 50.2% +1 +52 +77 52.0% +0.08 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 90.8 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1732 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 145.7 +4.38 -1.15 1.062 51.0% -13 +46 -65 55.2% +0.37 120–113 (52%) 100–110 (48%) 97.0 -1.27 — 1798 133.1 -0.56 +0.42 0.974 49.4% -23 +50 -10 50.4% -0.03 54–43 (56%) 44–40 (52%) 107.2 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.