H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Katie Obrien H2H: 1-0
Lucie Safarova holds a 1–0 lead over Katie Obrien in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2009 Portoroz third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2009* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-4 6-4 | Katie Obrien | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Katie Obrien | #782 | #84 | 769 | 1,514 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lucie Safarova | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #127 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #88 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,366 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |