H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 1-4

Maria Kirilenko holds a 4–1 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Maria Kirilenko leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2009 Monterrey fourth round 6-4 4-1 RET.

CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 2009* Monterrey WTA 500 R16 Hard Lucie Safarova #51 6-4 4-1 (ret.) Maria Kirilenko #38 Match data
Sep 26, 2008* Seoul WTA 250 R16 Hard Maria Kirilenko #33 6-3 6-3 Lucie Safarova #74 Match data
Aug 2, 2007* San Diego WTA 1000 R32 Hard Maria Kirilenko #42 6-4 7-6(3) Lucie Safarova #24 Match data
Feb 24, 2006* Dubai WTA 500 R16 Hard Maria Kirilenko #23 6-4 6-3 Lucie Safarova #31 Match data
Feb 24, 2005* Doha WTA 500 R32 Hard Maria Kirilenko #86 6-3 6-1 Lucie Safarova #192 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7