H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Maria Sharapova H2H: 2-5

Maria Sharapova holds a 5–2 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 3–2 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2015 Roland Garros fourth round 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Maria Sharapova
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 2, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Lucie Safarova #13 7-6(3) 6-4 Maria Sharapova #2 Match data
Apr 24, 2014* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Maria Sharapova #9 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 7-6(2) Lucie Safarova #26 Match data
Mar 20, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Maria Sharapova #7 6-4 6-7(7) 6-2 Lucie Safarova #27 Match data
Apr 26, 2013* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Maria Sharapova #2 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 Lucie Safarova #25 Match data
Sep 28, 2012* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Maria Sharapova #2 6-2 7-6(5) Lucie Safarova #17 Match data
May 11, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Maria Sharapova #2 (w/o) Lucie Safarova #23 Match data
May 12, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Lucie Safarova #30 6-4 6-3 Maria Sharapova #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Maria Sharapova #373 #1 10,690 2,238 596 174 77.4% 5 14 1 9 7 36

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Maria Sharapova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #188 1,503 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2003 24–12 66.7% #32 1,779 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 2004 55–16 77.5% #4 2,063 1 7
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2005 53–13 80.3% #4 2,068 1 10
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2006 59–10 85.5% #2 2,210 2 15
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2007 40–12 76.9% #5 2,113 2 16
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2008 31–6 83.8% #9 2,098 3 19
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2009 31–9 77.5% #14 2,050 3 20
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2010 33–11 75.0% #18 1,981 3 22
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2011 43–13 76.8% #4 1,993 3 24
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2012 55–10 84.6% #2 2,155 4 27
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2013 37–8 82.2% #4 2,136 4 29
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2014 50–13 79.4% #2 2,093 5 33
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2015 35–10 77.8% #4 2,044 5 35
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2016 4–1 80.0% #91 2,049 5 35
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2017 16–7 69.6% #61 1,976 5 36
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2018 21–11 65.6% #29 1,929 5 36
32 — — — — — — — 2019 8–8 50.0% #133 1,858 5 36
33 — — — — — — — 2020 0–2 0.0% #373 1,820 5 36