H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Na Li H2H: 1-7

Na Li holds a 7–1 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 6–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Australian Open third round 1-6 7-6(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 7
8 main draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Na Li #4 1-6 7-6(2) 6-3 Lucie Safarova #26 Match data
Aug 11, 2012* Montreal WTA 1000 SF Hard Na Li #11 3-6 6-3 7-5 Lucie Safarova #23 Match data
Apr 26, 2012* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Na Li #8 7-6(4) 6-4 Lucie Safarova #22 Match data
Jan 14, 2012* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Na Li #5 6-2 7-6(3) Lucie Safarova #25 Match data
Aug 18, 2011* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Na Li #5 6-3 6-4 Lucie Safarova #29 Match data
Oct 8, 2009* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Na Li #16 4-6 6-0 6-4 Lucie Safarova #41 Match data
Mar 7, 2009* Monterrey WTA 500 QF Hard Na Li #53 6-3 7-6(3) Lucie Safarova #51 Match data
May 1, 2005* Estoril WTA 250 F Clay Lucie Safarova #155 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 Na Li #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 — — — — — — —
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 — — — — — — — 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9