H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Sesil Karatantcheva H2H: 2-0
Lucie Safarova holds a 2–0 lead over Sesil Karatantcheva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2013 Nuremberg third round 6-2 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2013* | Nuremberg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lucie Safarova | 6-2 7-6(9) | Sesil Karatantcheva | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2012* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-4 6-4 | Sesil Karatantcheva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Sesil Karatantcheva | #1,329 | #35 | 919 | 1,727 | 50 | 75 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Safarova | Sesil Karatantcheva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #133 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #140 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |