H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 0-4

Yaroslava Shvedova holds a 4–0 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Yaroslava Shvedova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2016 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 5, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Yaroslava Shvedova #96 6-2 6-4 Lucie Safarova #29 Match data
Mar 12, 2016* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Yaroslava Shvedova #72 6-3 6-4 Lucie Safarova #13 Match data
Jan 21, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Yaroslava Shvedova #66 6-4 2-6 8-6 Lucie Safarova #16 Match data
Aug 15, 2012* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Yaroslava Shvedova #45 6-3 6-4 Lucie Safarova #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,751 141 175 44.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Yaroslava Shvedova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,470 0 1
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,665 0 1
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,576 0 1
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2012 16–12 57.1% #29 1,688 0 1
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,632 0 1
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,640 0 1
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,615 0 1
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2016 16–16 50.0% #37 1,700 0 1
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2017 4–11 26.7% #289 1,598 0 1
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,587 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–9 10.0% #434 1,493 0 1