H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Renata Voracova H2H: 1-0
Ludmila Cervanova holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Voracova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ludmila Cervanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2002 Casablanca third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2002* | Casablanca | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 6-4 6-3 | Renata Voracova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Renata Voracova | #1,041 | #74 | 848 | 1,523 | 24 | 54 | 30.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Renata Voracova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #128 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #81 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #184 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #212 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #844 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 |