H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Maddison Inglis vs Hailey Baptiste H2H: 1-0
Maddison Inglis holds a 1–0 lead over Hailey Baptiste in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maddison Inglis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maddison Inglis won the 2022 Australian Open second round 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2025 | Tokyo | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Maddison Inglis | 2-6 6-4 1-0 (ret.) | Hailey Baptiste | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Maddison Inglis | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 | Hailey Baptiste | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | #151 | #112 | 654 | 1,674 | 10 | 25 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hailey Baptiste | #33 | #25 | 1,747 | 1,882 | 55 | 61 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Hailey Baptiste | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #92 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #180 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #33 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |