H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Maddison Inglis vs Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove H2H: 0-1
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove holds a 1–0 lead over Maddison Inglis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove won the 2021 Nottingham second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2021* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove | 6-1 6-4 | Maddison Inglis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | #151 | #112 | 654 | 1,674 | 10 | 25 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove | #530 | #135 | 507 | 1,586 | 7 | 21 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #180 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #158 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #232 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |