Maddison Inglis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Sofia Kenin | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jan 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Laura Siegemund | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jan 22, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Maddison Inglis vs Polina Kudermetova H2H: 0-1
Polina Kudermetova holds a 1–0 lead over Maddison Inglis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Polina Kudermetova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Polina Kudermetova won the 2025 China Open first round 7-5 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polina Kudermetova | 7-5 7-6(7) | Maddison Inglis | Match data | Sep 24, 2025 | R128 | China Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | #134 | #112 | 654 | 1,674 | 10 | 25 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Polina Kudermetova | #97 | #54 | 1,054 | 1,760 | 22 | 36 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Polina Kudermetova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #107 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #104 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #180 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #134 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Polina Kudermetova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2021 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2026 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 9 | 19 | 28 | 32.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | 19 | 22 | 41 | 46.3% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 32/35 of Maddison Inglis's and 49/59 of Polina Kudermetova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Polina Kudermetova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2016 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 54.9% | 46.5% | 36.8% | 29.2% | 37.5% | 42.0% | 34.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9/9 | 3.2 | 5.2 | 54.3% | 64.0% | 39.3% | 54.5% | 40.1% | 52.3% | 41.1% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8/8 | 3.3 | 5.6 | 52.6% | 67.1% | 47.0% | 56.3% | 50.2% | 57.7% | 44.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 71.5% | 51.6% | 41.5% | 45.8% | 52.5% | 48.6% | 39.3% | 2025 | 22/32 | 2.8 | 5.5 | 56.1% | 61.2% | 42.4% | 47.0% | 41.2% | 53.0% | 40.4% |
| 23 | 2021 | 12/12 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 62.7% | 59.4% | 45.8% | 48.3% | 28.1% | 54.2% | 39.6% | 2026 | 10/10 | 2.9 | 6.4 | 56.7% | 58.4% | 36.0% | 49.2% | 40.2% | 49.0% | 38.3% |
| 24 | 2022 | 8/8 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 66.2% | 60.4% | 40.2% | 48.3% | 61.8% | 54.1% | 42.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 4/6 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 59.3% | 53.7% | 47.4% | 40.7% | 25.8% | 51.4% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 4/5 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 63.5% | 60.8% | 47.0% | 40.1% | 52.4% | 55.8% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 32/35 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 63.3% | 57.8% | 43.9% | 45.0% | 41.4% | 52.9% | 39.2% | — | 49/59 | 3.0 | 5.6 | 55.3% | 62.1% | 41.3% | 50.4% | 42.3% | 52.8% | 40.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Polina Kudermetova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1501 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1485 | 93.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1484 | 102.2 | -2.40 | -1.06 | 0.587 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.15 | 2021 | 1474 | 96.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1527 | 106.6 | -2.42 | -0.64 | 0.863 | 47.1% | -31 | — | +141 | 35.0% | -1.30 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.51 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1477 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1609 | 125.3 | -0.09 | +0.80 | 1.041 | 51.0% | -18 | — | — | 63.2% | +0.79 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.15 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1445 | 97.5 | -1.27 | +0.38 | 0.766 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.11 | 2025 | 1585 | 133.1 | -2.37 | -1.78 | 0.860 | 46.9% | +14 | -26 | — | 40.0% | -0.94 | 2–8 (20%) | 4–3 (57%) | 96.0 | -0.35 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1474 | 111.4 | -2.32 | -2.08 | 0.865 | 46.8% | +4 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.44 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.33 | 2026 | 1693 | 116.3 | -3.23 | -2.20 | 0.752 | 43.8% | -27 | — | — | 30.4% | -1.43 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.0 | -0.15 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1485 | 99.8 | -2.83 | -0.47 | 0.921 | 48.4% | +26 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.10 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–0 | — | +0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 1475 | 90.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 1455 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 1582 | 115.3 | -2.30 | -1.96 | 0.751 | 43.7% | -5 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.00 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 1628 | 113.3 | +0.92 | +0.33 | 0.836 | 46.3% | +31 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.82 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.4 | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1674 | 109.6 | -1.98 | -1.14 | 0.832 | 46.1% | +13 | — | — | 31.7% | -1.51 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.4 | +2.00 | — | 1761 | 124.6 | -2.18 | -1.24 | 0.863 | 47.0% | -2 | -26 | +141 | 40.9% | -0.83 | 6–12 (33%) | 6–5 (55%) | 98.8 | +0.28 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Polina Kudermetova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liudmila Samsonova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 28, 2025 | H2H |
| Veronika Kudermetova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 9, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 7, 2025 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 2, 2025 | H2H |