H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Maddison Inglis vs Tereza Smitkova H2H: 0-1
Tereza Smitkova holds a 1–0 lead over Maddison Inglis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tereza Smitkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tereza Smitkova won the 2021 Prague third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2021* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tereza Smitkova | 6-2 6-2 | Maddison Inglis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | #151 | #112 | 654 | 1,674 | 10 | 25 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tereza Smitkova | #1,143 | #57 | 904 | 1,565 | 15 | 33 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Tereza Smitkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #180 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #262 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #267 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |