H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Madison Brengle vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 2-1

Madison Brengle holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Madison Brengle leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2019 San Jose first round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Brengle #78 6-0 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #77 Match data Aug 1, 2019* R32 San Jose Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Andrea Petkovic #11 6-4 6-4 Madison Brengle #43 Match data Apr 10, 2015* R16 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Madison Brengle #64 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #13 Match data Jan 21, 2015* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,988 279 228 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Brengle Andrea Petkovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0
19 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,614 0 1
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,787 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,973 0 2
24 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,855 0 2
25 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,801 0 2
26 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,828 0 5
27 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,689 0 6
28 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0 2016 19–20 48.7% #55 1,694 0 6
29 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0 2017 12–21 36.4% #99 1,648 0 6
30 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0 2018 16–14 53.3% #64 1,725 0 6
31 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,716 0 6
32 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,700 0 6
33 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,729 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,708 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Brengle Andrea Petkovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 21 14 35 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 33 10 43 76.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 15 14 29 51.7% 19 5 24 79.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 19 18 37 51.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 10 12 22 45.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 13 9 22 59.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2019 10 11 21 47.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2020 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0% — — — — — 170 142 312 54.5% 79 57 136 58.1% 24 26 50 48.0% 6 3 9 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 225/246 of Madison Brengle's and 452/505 of Andrea Petkovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Brengle Andrea Petkovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5% 2007 3/6 1.7 2.3 72.7% 59.0% 67.8% 57.1% 38.9% 60.9% 42.0%
20 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6% 2009 18/19 3.1 2.5 64.4% 64.3% 48.7% 51.8% 45.7% 58.4% 46.5%
22 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7% 2010 53/57 3.9 2.8 63.6% 62.9% 48.4% 58.6% 46.9% 57.5% 44.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 56/67 2.2 2.1 70.0% 62.7% 50.3% 56.4% 50.6% 59.0% 48.2%
24 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3% 2012 18/18 1.1 1.9 74.6% 57.5% 48.1% 47.6% 43.6% 55.2% 46.9%
25 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3% 2013 32/33 2.2 3.2 66.8% 63.7% 47.7% 55.2% 53.4% 58.3% 47.2%
26 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1% 2014 52/61 1.8 2.7 68.3% 61.4% 46.8% 48.8% 51.1% 56.9% 46.4%
27 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1% 2015 40/54 1.6 3.1 66.0% 61.4% 50.5% 51.1% 49.4% 57.6% 45.3%
28 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5% 2016 38/39 1.9 3.9 64.0% 62.4% 44.9% 48.5% 47.6% 56.1% 45.2%
29 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2% 2017 29/33 0.5 3.3 69.4% 56.2% 42.3% 48.1% 42.0% 52.1% 46.1%
30 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3% 2018 26/30 1.4 3.8 66.1% 60.2% 47.0% 58.6% 47.7% 55.6% 44.4%
31 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1% 2019 35/35 2.0 3.9 63.0% 60.8% 44.2% 50.1% 44.5% 54.7% 43.1%
32 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0% 2020 1/1 2.0 6.0 63.5% 54.5% 15.8% 14.3% 50.0% 40.4% 39.7%
33 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0% 2021 32/32 2.5 3.8 64.5% 60.6% 47.6% 49.0% 50.7% 56.0% 44.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 19/20 2.7 3.5 64.9% 61.1% 44.2% 49.2% 42.7% 55.3% 39.5%
Career — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5% — 452/507 2.1 3.1 66.5% 61.4% 47.3% 52.2% 48.0% 56.6% 45.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Brengle Andrea Petkovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40 2006 1497 107.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.31
19 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06 2007 1503 107.1 +1.50 +0.78 1.075 51.4% +9 +35 — 35.7% -0.50 1–1 — — +0.06
20 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 2008 1501 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.24
21 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03 2009 1614 128.0 +1.55 +1.69 1.118 52.5% -54 +32 — 55.0% +0.52 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.67
22 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16 2010 1788 148.0 +2.10 +1.40 1.046 50.9% -23 -95 -103 54.8% +0.44 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 106.9 -2.09
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1974 155.4 +3.70 +4.59 1.176 53.6% -8 -117 -298 67.6% +1.21 14–6 (70%) 6–5 (55%) 107.7 +0.95
24 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14 2012 1855 137.0 +0.30 +1.98 1.047 50.8% +13 — — 51.3% +0.38 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -1.34
25 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20 2013 1802 138.0 +2.53 +2.59 1.133 52.5% +13 +56 — 56.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 -1.81
26 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69 2014 1828 145.1 +0.94 +2.73 1.076 51.6% -34 +124 -137 59.4% +0.64 14–7 (67%) 8–7 (53%) 104.6 +0.56
27 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74 2015 1690 138.2 -0.26 +3.30 1.069 51.5% +6 +218 +14 52.9% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 5–8 (38%) 95.7 +3.27
28 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35 2016 1695 134.5 0.00 +1.98 1.029 50.5% +17 +124 +6 52.3% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 +0.16
29 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29 2017 1649 122.9 -3.25 +1.84 0.962 49.0% +30 +25 +34 40.8% -0.36 5–9 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 94.0 +0.52
30 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11 2018 1725 133.1 -0.84 +0.44 1.000 50.1% +4 -68 — 52.9% +0.19 6–4 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 102.8 -0.49
31 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62 2019 1716 128.9 -1.22 -0.16 0.950 49.1% -1 -46 -56 48.0% -0.12 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.2 -0.57
32 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90 2020 1700 98.6 -0.48 +2.36 0.665 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.03
33 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 2021 1730 129.0 -0.07 +1.75 1.016 50.4% -44 +70 -86 47.8% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -2.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1709 124.6 -1.01 -1.99 0.884 47.5% -28 +78 -115 45.2% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -1.76
35 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77 — 1989 144.1 +0.65 +2.02 1.047 51.0% -6 +34 -75 54.0% +0.36 91–79 (54%) 53–55 (49%) 102.0 -0.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.