H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Madison Brengle vs Melinda Czink H2H: 1-0

Madison Brengle holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Madison Brengle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2011 Washington Open round of 32 7-6(5) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Brengle #222 7-6(5) 7-5 Melinda Czink #160 Match data Jul 25, 2011 R32 Washington Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,796 89 137 39.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Brengle Melinda Czink
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0 2004 2–16 11.1% #128 1,427 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0
24 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0
25 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0
26 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,533 0 1
28 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,525 0 1
29 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1
30 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,500 0 1
31 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Brengle Melinda Czink
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
21 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 3 9 12 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0% — 56 77 133 42.1% 22 44 66 33.3% 11 16 27 40.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 225/246 of Madison Brengle's and 143/226 of Melinda Czink's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Brengle Melinda Czink
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2% 2003 3/7 1.0 1.7 65.3% 58.7% 40.7% 45.8% 31.9% 52.1% 41.9%
21 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6% 2004 4/18 1.0 2.0 70.2% 54.4% 42.8% 39.0% 56.8% 50.8% 44.0%
22 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7% 2005 1/21 1.0 4.0 71.4% 54.3% 28.6% 50.0% 100.0% 46.9% 29.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/32 2.0 3.3 71.5% 59.4% 46.2% 60.2% 50.6% 55.2% 42.5%
24 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3% 2007 4/12 1.0 4.5 62.6% 62.1% 45.1% 40.4% 36.1% 55.8% 36.3%
25 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3% 2008 16/21 2.8 5.2 62.8% 66.0% 42.4% 50.4% 55.5% 57.1% 39.5%
26 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1% 2009 44/50 3.5 5.5 61.7% 64.9% 47.8% 49.9% 51.8% 58.1% 42.7%
27 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1% 2010 19/19 2.8 6.3 61.0% 61.3% 39.9% 46.1% 28.6% 52.9% 38.0%
28 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5% 2011 9/9 2.3 6.8 61.8% 61.7% 47.4% 43.6% 45.3% 56.0% 40.8%
29 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2% 2012 25/25 2.7 4.2 59.6% 64.5% 48.9% 53.6% 46.3% 58.1% 39.5%
30 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3% 2013 12/12 3.3 4.7 62.4% 63.3% 40.1% 50.6% 43.7% 54.8% 36.9%
31 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5% — 143/226 2.8 5.0 62.2% 63.3% 45.1% 49.5% 46.6% 56.3% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Brengle Melinda Czink
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 2003 1568 119.7 -0.23 +0.05 0.875 46.6% +6 -6 — 44.4% -0.50 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.33
21 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03 2004 1428 98.7 -0.95 -0.17 0.894 47.4% +79 +17 — 21.4% -2.07 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.23
22 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16 2005 1478 105.8 -1.18 -2.27 0.558 37.9% +88 -105 — 41.7% -0.67 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.54
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1501 112.0 -1.09 -1.39 0.950 49.1% +30 -48 +15 45.9% -0.36 6–6 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 +1.02
24 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14 2007 1457 101.5 -0.83 -2.90 0.821 45.7% +57 -51 — 31.0% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.11
25 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20 2008 1559 122.7 +0.81 -3.19 0.920 48.5% +7 -110 -18 47.9% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +0.10
26 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69 2009 1759 133.3 +2.15 -0.64 1.020 50.5% -34 -162 -152 58.7% +0.35 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 104.0 -0.55
27 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74 2010 1533 110.0 -1.99 -4.02 0.807 45.6% +115 -53 +11 23.3% -1.44 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 -0.52
28 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35 2011 1526 106.8 +0.76 +0.06 0.926 48.6% +77 — +41 40.9% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 +0.11
29 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29 2012 1544 120.7 +2.01 -3.55 0.942 49.0% +9 -66 +104 40.7% -0.48 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.29
30 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11 2013 1500 108.6 -0.99 -4.61 0.816 46.1% +48 -61 — 30.0% -1.37 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.51
31 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77 — 1796 120.5 +0.70 -2.25 0.922 48.4% +30 -76 -4 42.0% -0.58 39–45 (46%) 29–32 (48%) 99.0 -0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.