H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Madison Brengle vs Michelle Larcher De Brito H2H: 0-1

Michelle Larcher De Brito holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Larcher De Brito leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michelle Larcher De Brito won the 2010 Memphis round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Michelle Larcher De Brito
Portugal Age 33 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michelle Larcher De Brito #117 6-3 6-3 Madison Brengle #183 Match data Feb 18, 2010* R32 Memphis International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Michelle Larcher De Brito #1,216 #76 821 1,630 30 42 41.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Brengle Michelle Larcher De Brito
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #296 1,518 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2008 8–6 57.1% #130 1,616 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2009 5–7 41.7% #113 1,603 0 0
17 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0 2010 5–8 38.5% #210 1,571 0 0
18 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0 2012 3–6 33.3% #130 1,528 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0 2013 3–7 30.0% #117 1,508 0 0
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0 2014 2–5 28.6% #123 1,497 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #226 1,530 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #231 1,519 0 0
24 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Brengle Michelle Larcher De Brito
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0% — 15 27 42 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 11 8 19 57.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 225/246 of Madison Brengle's and 53/72 of Michelle Larcher De Brito's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Brengle Michelle Larcher De Brito
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 0.5 11.5 55.9% 56.7% 44.7% 51.3% 45.0% 51.4% 40.0%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 10/14 0.6 5.5 62.0% 57.5% 45.0% 53.1% 45.9% 52.5% 45.4%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 10/12 0.3 8.7 61.7% 56.7% 39.7% 45.7% 58.6% 50.2% 44.9%
17 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0% 2010 12/13 0.3 5.8 57.0% 55.8% 42.9% 50.3% 48.5% 50.7% 39.7%
18 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5% 2012 7/9 0.6 5.6 64.8% 53.2% 37.0% 47.6% 55.6% 47.5% 46.0%
20 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2% 2013 4/10 0.0 3.8 62.7% 53.0% 47.9% 43.9% 39.6% 51.2% 37.9%
21 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6% 2014 3/7 0.7 6.0 56.3% 58.2% 45.8% 59.1% 21.9% 52.9% 41.1%
22 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7% 2015 3/3 1.0 4.3 73.5% 56.7% 69.8% 49.6% 74.1% 60.0% 44.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 2/2 1.0 3.5 69.9% 59.3% 41.7% 55.0% 30.0% 54.2% 38.0%
24 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5% — 53/72 0.5 6.2 61.6% 56.1% 44.0% 49.8% 49.3% 51.4% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Brengle Michelle Larcher De Brito
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 107.6 -2.05 +2.65 0.822 45.7% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.27
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1616 127.4 -1.08 +1.24 0.955 49.0% +27 — — 50.0% -0.21 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 105.0 -0.01
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1603 111.7 -2.92 -0.21 0.902 47.8% +1 -47 — 42.9% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.3 +0.35
17 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27 2010 1571 104.1 -2.73 -2.95 0.806 45.7% -18 0 +67 33.3% -0.97 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.26
18 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06 2012 1529 101.7 -3.16 -0.55 0.875 46.7% -20 — — 37.5% -0.67 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — +0.81
20 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 2013 1509 106.8 -1.46 -0.63 0.776 44.9% -53 — +145 28.6% -1.43 1–0 1–1 — +0.34
21 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03 2014 1498 101.1 -0.50 +1.15 0.872 46.8% — — +212 33.3% -1.11 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.35
22 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16 2015 1530 108.6 +0.29 -0.81 1.116 52.2% — — +205 57.1% +0.43 1–0 1–0 — +0.22
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1520 93.1 -1.26 -1.07 0.829 46.8% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.02
24 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14 2017 1502 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77 — 1630 112.2 -2.04 -0.51 0.879 47.3% -6 -24 +150 39.8% -0.73 19–10 (66%) 7–9 (44%) 106.7 +2.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.