H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Madison Brengle vs Serena Williams H2H: 1-1

Madison Brengle and Serena Williams are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 1–0 on clay, while Madison Brengle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2017 Auckland fourth round 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Brengle
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 5, 2017* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Madison Brengle #72 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 Serena Williams #2 Match data
May 6, 2015* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-0 6-1 Madison Brengle #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Madison Brengle #210 #35 1,324 1,740 94 151 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Brengle Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,502 0 0 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,456 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,459 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 — — — — — — — 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,503 0 0 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,627 0 0 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2016 16–22 42.1% #73 1,602 0 0 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,656 0 0 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,606 0 0 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,641 0 0 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,637 0 0 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,586 0 0 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 — — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71