H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Madison Keys vs Caroline Wozniacki H2H: 1-2
Caroline Wozniacki holds a 2–1 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Madison Keys leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2019 Charleston final 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2019* | Charleston | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Madison Keys | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2017* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-4 6-4 | Madison Keys | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-3 6-4 | Madison Keys | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Madison Keys | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 |
| 21 | 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 |
| 22 | 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 |
| 23 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 |
| 24 | 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 |
| 25 | 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 |
| 26 | 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 |
| 27 | 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 |
| 29 | 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 |
| 30 | 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 |