H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Madison Keys vs Danka Kovinic H2H: 1-0
Madison Keys holds a 1–0 lead over Danka Kovinic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Madison Keys leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Madison Keys | 6-3 6-3 | Danka Kovinic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,133 | 367 | 213 | 63.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,754 | 85 | 123 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Madison Keys | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,938 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #71 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,900 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,867 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,865 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,889 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,941 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |