H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Madison Keys vs Donna Vekic H2H: 5-1

Madison Keys holds a 5–1 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Madison Keys leads 4–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2026 Charleston Open second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
United States Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main-draw meetings
Donna Vekic
Croatia Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Keys #18 6-2 6-3 Donna Vekic #115 Match data Apr 1, 2026 R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Madison Keys #5 6-2 6-3 Donna Vekic #21 Match data Apr 29, 2025 R16 Madrid Open WTA 1000 Clay
Madison Keys #5 4-6 7-6(7) 6-3 Donna Vekic #22 Match data Mar 12, 2025 R16 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Donna Vekic #24 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Madison Keys #17 Match data Aug 7, 2019* R64 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Madison Keys #14 7-6(2) 7-6(0) Donna Vekic #52 Match data May 17, 2018* R32 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Madison Keys #17 6-3 6-2 Donna Vekic #96 Match data May 24, 2016* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Keys #24 #5 5,004 2,134 374 217 63.3% 1 1 0 7 2 11
Donna Vekic #39 #17 2,458 1,933 243 239 50.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Donna Vekic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,725 0 0 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,552 0 1
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,743 0 1 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,810 0 1 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,562 0 1
21 2016 46–18 71.9% #8 1,943 0 2 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,670 0 2
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,902 0 3 2018 31–24 56.4% #34 1,781 0 2
23 2018 28–16 63.6% #17 1,907 0 3 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,770 0 2
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,913 0 5 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,695 0 2
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,869 0 5 2021 16–15 51.6% #68 1,760 0 3
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,733 0 5 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,801 0 3
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,865 0 6 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,778 0 4
28 2023 29–16 64.4% #12 1,907 0 7 2024 31–20 60.8% #19 1,896 0 4
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,945 0 8 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,741 0 4
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2026 12–13 48.0% #39 1,745 0 5
31 2026 31–14 68.9% #24 1,982 1 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Keys Donna Vekic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2012 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 2013 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2014 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2014 14 14 28 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2015 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 2015 18 12 30 60.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2016 28 13 41 68.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 1 9 88.9% 2017 9 16 25 36.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 2017 15 5 20 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6%
23 2018 16 10 26 61.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2019 24 18 42 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2019 16 9 25 64.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2020 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 2022 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 2022 25 14 39 64.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2023 15 12 27 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0%
28 2023 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3%
29 2024 7 6 13 53.8% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2025 9 13 22 40.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 2025 24 8 32 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 2026 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
31 2026 14 9 23 60.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 218 142 360 60.6% 93 54 147 63.3% 63 21 84 75.0% — 149 162 311 47.9% 39 42 81 48.1% 55 35 90 61.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 543/591 of Madison Keys's and 444/483 of Donna Vekic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Keys Donna Vekic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2009 2/2 3.0 2.0 47.5% 66.4% 55.5% 44.4% 41.7% 60.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 3/3 5.0 6.3 55.4% 67.2% 46.9% 60.5% 44.8% 58.2% 44.8% 2012 4/5 4.3 2.3 52.3% 70.6% 53.9% 25.0% 53.1% 62.9% 44.2%
17 2012 5/5 2.0 3.4 58.1% 56.5% 44.8% 38.4% 32.9% 51.2% 36.0% 2013 24/24 2.7 2.8 56.0% 65.9% 50.9% 40.1% 46.9% 58.9% 44.8%
18 2013 39/41 5.4 2.1 59.6% 70.0% 48.7% 65.0% 45.9% 61.4% 42.4% 2014 30/30 3.7 4.4 53.3% 66.6% 40.9% 47.3% 54.0% 54.4% 42.1%
19 2014 45/48 4.8 1.9 60.0% 69.4% 50.0% 50.9% 48.7% 61.9% 43.5% 2015 14/20 3.9 5.6 57.9% 63.2% 43.0% 40.1% 45.4% 54.1% 38.4%
20 2015 38/50 7.3 2.2 62.2% 71.5% 51.3% 61.5% 48.1% 64.1% 41.2% 2016 20/20 2.9 6.3 49.8% 64.6% 39.8% 54.2% 52.4% 52.2% 40.3%
21 2016 49/64 5.5 1.9 64.4% 70.5% 52.7% 60.1% 52.6% 64.1% 43.8% 2017 36/37 4.0 5.3 56.0% 65.3% 45.8% 58.3% 47.7% 56.5% 40.6%
22 2017 27/27 4.5 2.9 62.7% 69.2% 49.3% 59.9% 47.8% 62.0% 43.9% 2018 49/55 3.1 4.7 55.1% 67.5% 44.7% 52.0% 48.1% 57.3% 45.4%
23 2018 42/44 5.3 1.6 64.0% 71.2% 47.8% 57.5% 45.0% 62.8% 44.2% 2019 59/59 3.6 4.3 57.1% 69.9% 47.5% 48.2% 52.0% 60.4% 45.0%
24 2019 40/40 6.9 2.5 62.0% 71.3% 47.2% 59.7% 46.2% 62.0% 43.9% 2020 19/19 2.9 4.4 58.0% 65.5% 43.7% 43.4% 45.6% 56.9% 42.5%
25 2020 13/13 4.8 0.9 67.7% 72.9% 51.8% 55.6% 48.6% 66.2% 44.1% 2021 28/31 4.6 5.5 57.2% 70.4% 45.8% 53.6% 44.5% 59.7% 43.1%
26 2021 26/26 4.6 2.4 63.7% 66.7% 43.0% 58.2% 39.9% 58.2% 41.3% 2022 25/25 3.8 5.3 56.6% 68.9% 45.0% 52.3% 57.0% 58.5% 41.5%
27 2022 48/49 4.4 3.1 63.3% 67.9% 48.2% 54.1% 44.3% 60.8% 43.7% 2023 46/47 4.0 5.4 56.0% 67.6% 44.2% 52.8% 51.8% 57.4% 43.6%
28 2023 43/45 3.9 1.9 67.5% 68.3% 48.3% 60.2% 48.0% 62.0% 44.4% 2024 44/51 4.8 4.8 57.2% 71.9% 45.2% 49.1% 46.5% 60.4% 44.1%
29 2024 36/37 3.8 2.7 69.4% 66.5% 46.5% 60.4% 46.5% 60.6% 44.9% 2025 22/35 3.0 5.8 53.4% 64.6% 39.6% 51.8% 43.1% 53.0% 41.1%
30 2025 42/52 4.4 3.8 65.8% 66.8% 46.6% 57.8% 44.0% 59.9% 45.5% 2026 24/25 3.9 4.5 58.0% 67.7% 45.2% 55.4% 38.1% 58.4% 40.9%
31 2026 45/45 4.2 3.5 64.3% 71.5% 47.4% 56.1% 48.8% 63.0% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 543/591 5.0 2.5 63.7% 69.3% 48.5% 58.1% 46.7% 61.8% 43.7% — 444/483 3.7 4.8 55.9% 67.7% 44.9% 50.2% 48.7% 57.6% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Keys Donna Vekic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2009 1513 104.9 -0.92 -0.60 0.987 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 1517 113.3 -3.13 -0.25 1.071 51.6% +19 — — 50.0% +0.25 0–2 0–1 — -0.02 2012 1565 114.5 +2.21 -1.39 1.193 53.0% +23 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 1–0 — +0.32
17 2012 1514 113.2 -0.48 -2.14 0.738 43.5% +13 — — 18.2% -2.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.51 2013 1604 122.4 +1.86 +0.10 1.090 51.8% -25 — +81 50.0% +0.17 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -0.09
18 2013 1726 137.3 +4.59 -0.90 1.100 51.9% -46 -118 -57 58.2% +0.62 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 99.0 +0.04 2014 1552 122.1 -1.63 -1.74 0.922 48.4% +17 — +134 44.6% -0.50 5–9 (36%) 6–1 (86%) 100.6 -0.23
19 2014 1744 136.9 +5.12 +0.02 1.142 52.3% -64 -93 +79 56.9% +0.45 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 -0.67 2015 1606 102.7 -2.51 -2.71 0.835 46.2% -21 -76 — 44.7% -0.74 6–1 (86%) — — +0.62
20 2015 1811 145.8 +4.84 +0.40 1.147 52.7% -23 -103 +11 63.6% +1.03 7–8 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.8 +0.70 2016 1563 111.8 -2.41 -1.13 0.843 46.5% +44 -99 — 24.4% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 -0.76
21 2016 1943 152.0 +7.53 +1.31 1.219 53.7% -32 -117 -34 65.8% +1.11 17–6 (74%) 14–10 (58%) 107.1 -0.49 2017 1670 128.8 +0.13 -1.26 0.933 48.8% -42 -177 +56 45.8% -0.31 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 94.6 -0.63
22 2017 1903 141.2 +3.97 +1.46 1.155 52.9% +43 -160 — 62.5% +0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 +0.26 2018 1782 137.0 +0.35 +2.36 1.063 51.2% -52 -181 -7 57.0% +0.37 4–11 (27%) 6–6 (50%) 92.6 +0.05
23 2018 1908 147.8 +5.83 +1.52 1.190 53.3% +17 -74 -12 68.1% +1.16 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.2 +1.54 2019 1771 150.5 +3.02 +2.45 1.137 52.4% -24 -62 +25 60.0% +0.92 8–11 (42%) 4–14 (22%) 89.1 +1.18
24 2019 1913 148.9 +4.30 +0.69 1.158 52.9% +7 -4 — 66.3% +1.05 7–7 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 99.5 +0.99 2020 1696 131.1 +0.33 0.00 0.985 49.4% +28 -43 — 40.5% -0.26 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.62
25 2020 1869 136.6 +5.26 +1.22 1.305 54.4% +23 — — 65.4% +1.46 1–1 1–1 — +0.59 2021 1761 140.5 +1.94 +0.45 1.069 51.4% +17 — +73 52.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 97.9 -0.11
26 2021 1733 127.6 +1.29 -0.81 0.988 49.7% +11 +120 +234 43.6% -0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–5 (0%) 97.1 +1.25 2022 1802 135.2 +1.22 +0.17 0.999 50.4% +25 — +9 50.0% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -0.92
27 2022 1866 154.5 +3.52 +1.76 1.116 52.1% +14 -43 — 61.1% +0.58 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 100.5 -1.43 2023 1779 141.0 +1.13 +0.49 1.024 50.6% +3 -119 +117 53.8% +0.22 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) 104.1 -0.44
28 2023 1908 154.0 +4.44 +2.18 1.168 53.1% -24 -103 +181 65.3% +1.28 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 98.3 +0.85 2024 1896 146.2 +3.22 +1.18 1.113 51.8% -95 -87 +112 57.0% +0.69 12–11 (52%) 6–10 (38%) 100.0 -0.31
29 2024 1945 153.9 +3.89 +2.77 1.137 52.5% -67 +54 +149 67.1% +1.18 5–3 (63%) 9–3 (75%) 105.9 +0.01 2025 1741 135.8 -2.37 -0.97 0.874 47.3% +6 +22 +152 41.3% -0.52 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 96.9 +1.04
30 2025 1964 160.3 +2.87 +2.39 1.133 52.4% +63 +39 +107 63.5% +0.80 16–6 (73%) 10–7 (59%) 107.8 -0.52 2026 1745 136.4 +1.44 -0.81 0.983 49.6% -63 +83 +195 50.0% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.3 +0.22
31 2026 1982 152.9 +5.09 +2.77 1.218 53.6% -16 +38 +175 65.7% +1.21 8–8 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 93.5 +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2135 155.9 +4.46 +1.22 1.145 52.6% -6 -39 +96 62.4% +0.87 97–85 (53%) 92–73 (56%) 101.0 +0.62 — 1933 141.1 +0.87 +0.34 1.014 50.3% -15 -75 +82 50.5% +0.11 74–86 (46%) 59–76 (44%) 94.2 +0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.